User talk:KFA UK

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KFA UK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have commited no vandalism! I reported raymond arritt for wikistalking and accusing me falsely of being a sockpuppet of frogsprog on user talk:MONGO, then when I log in.. i realise MONGO has blocked me! there is no proof that I am a sockpuppet or a vandal! this is ridiculous! additionally, I would like to say that MONGO is violating policy by harrasing newcomers and not assuming good faith KFA UK 20:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well considering that your account was created less than a week after Frogsprog's ban and that you're edit-warring in exactly the same manner [1] [2] [3] when compared to [4] [5] [6], it's pretty obvious to conclude that you are indeed a sockpuppet. -- Netsnipe ► 19:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KFA UK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have emailed the admin unblock email please take action and unblock me --KFA UK 19:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If that admin agrees with you then he/she will unblock you. --WinHunter ^(talk) 16:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser (Dmcdevit) has now confirmed that this account is a sockpuppet of Frogsprog (82.43.244.187). -- Netsnipe ► 19:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries.

Just be careful... Cheers, -- Visviva 15:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert rule

Please keep in mind the three-revert rule on Wikipedia. This is not a warning, just a friendly note to make sure you're not caught by surprise. --Reuben 16:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]