User talk:KDevaney

I thought I would let you know I replied about my short bio:

I don't really care about its status. I put it up: 1) Students kept writing and they use WP for info; 2) Someone told me something was going to be put up, so I preempted with a short, factual summary (I followed the form of others I found); 3) There were links on other pages to me, seemed like worth filling in (some I note are now gone). I am as happy to have it gone as up. Your choice. Happy editing. Best, Mike (oh and after reading the criteria, it certainly wouldn't violate NPOV. It is pretty damn factual. Do whatever you like. I would like to know, however, why you think factual data on my interests, etc violates NPOV, but a statement such as "These groups, however, are a small minority in the literature" on the FFA entry is okay. Why not just leave it that there is an alternative POV? What is neutral about this highly pejorative statement? Good luck.)

AfD nomination of Kyle Cave

I have nominated Kyle Cave, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Cave. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rtphokie (talk) 18:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kyle Cave

The article Kyle Cave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:PROF, WP:GNG as far as I can tell

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]