User talk:KDayne

Welcome!

Hello, Chris-schannes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

Thanks for archiving the "Max 207" reference. Unfortunately the archive doesn't seem to work properly, for me anyway. The Wayback Machine is still not 100% operational. I just tried to archive the "Max 206" reference from Wuhan and that didn't work properly either. I was using Ghost Archive for a while but it is a bit "iffy" sometimes, so I've just kept a record of all the citations either "ghosted" or not archived atall, and intend to go back through them all once the Wayback Machine is working properly again. Alan (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no worries. I saw that you were the one who used to archive all the references and then I noticed that they stopped being archived, so I went to the Wayback Machine myself and saw what the problem was. Just had another look today and it seems to be working again for me. It shouldn't be a huge issue, the WST articles should stay up at least for the rest of the season, if not longer now that they've revamped the whole website, I doubt they're gonna do another major rehaul anytime soon. But yeah, it's good to get those archived if possible because WST as a whole can't be relied upon to keep the urls live. KDayne (talk) 20:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That archive for the "Max 207" reference seems to be working OK now. Patience is all that is required I think. Alan (talk) 16:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KDayne: I have been going through and updating archives, and the Wayback Machine "Save Page Now" is still not working reliably. It keeps telling me that "there was a delay in registering", but 24 hours later it's still not done. You seem to be having the same problem, since this archive which you did yesterday doesn't work either. I'm running out of patience. Any ideas?

Alan (talk) 09:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, don't know, just keep trying I guess. KDayne (talk) 10:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried a different approach, which was only partially successful. I copied five refs into my sandbox, deleted the non-working archives from them, and then ran the "Fix dead links" IABot on the page. It took a long while to complete, and was successful for only one of the five. This is becoming really frustrating. Alan (talk) 10:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted this message on the Internet Archive forum, but I don't expect to get a response. Alan (talk) 13:15, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah it's frustrating but I tend not to be too harsh on the Wayback Machine people, they're doing good, important work and mostly as a labour of love. I also read that they recently had some server issues because of cyber attacks so that whole incident might still have some repercussions.

But I think I found out that if you go to save a page, and when accessing the link, it gives you the error message, I think that it is actually archived but it will take some time until the links work properly. When archiving a few of the CoC refs, I noticed that the links it gave me still had the date when I initially tried archiving them (14 November) and now they work. While trying newer links that I hadn't tried archiving before, currently don't work. But maybe they will as well in a few days. KDayne (talk) 14:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I've just been doing some old ones in the NI Open. These were saved by me on the 10th to the 14th and have only just appeared. So patience is required. Alan (talk) 14:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]