User talk:KAL4FreeEducation

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.--Gorpik (talk) 13:54, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 11:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KAL4FreeEducation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I recently learnt about Jammcard and managed to witness a few of their activities. It came to my attention that oddly enough, there is no wikipedia page available for Jammcard. So, I added it and I believe I have used neutral language in developing the article. The core idea of the company is to create a network for musicians and I tried to show this by mentioning the affiliations that I found online on reliable sources. That might have reflected the impression that I am advertising for a person or a party! I have absolutely no connections with the company and as a third party individual I believe a wikipedia page which educates about this company is definitely needed. So, instead of drafting the page I would suggest editing it or even deleting parts. Please feel free to curb the tone of the article.

Decline reason:

And it's of course entirely a coincidence that every edit of yours outside the draft that I checked added a Jammcard-related external link to some unrelated page? Sorry, I don't believe this. Clearly linkspam. Huon (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KAL4FreeEducation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you Huon. I added Jammcard-related links to the wikipedia pages of the artists who were related to Jammcard. That was a mistake on my side since the Jammcard article was the first article I was starting from scratch on wikipedia and I was not familiar enough with the policies. Apologies for that. Still, the Jammcard article on its own educates about this company and I believe that there is no need for the article not to exist.

Decline reason:

After examining your edits, I must concur with my colleague Huon; I do not believe this explanation. Until you are honest about your relationship with Jammcard, I see no pathway to being unblocked for you. I am declining your request; you can make another request to attempt to convince another admin to unblock you, but if you make too many unsuccessful requests, you will lose access to this page too. 331dot (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Jammcard

Hello, KAL4FreeEducation. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jammcard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]