User talk:JzG/Archive 45

This is an archive of past discussions about User:JzG. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 40

←

Archive 43

→

Serious problems with user:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz

Hi Guy,

You don't know me but I was hoping you could help me? I curious to know if you have any evidence that user:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz is actually blocked blockedTruthCrusader? [1]

He's been harassing a group of editors (including myself) being uncivil, targeting certain articles, name calling, wiki-bullying, and basically being an underhanded jerk using policy against new editors as a weapon instead of a tool. A few of us suspect he might have a LGBT bias as well.

some of the discussion below:

[2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swancookie (talk • contribs) 02:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]

Any concrete evidence would be help as he needs to be stopped. He's making wikipedia miserable for people whom are truly trying to better articles. If he is indeed evading a block then I think action needs to be taken to block his current identity.

thanks, Swancookie (talk) 02:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

irregularities with your user page

irregularities with your user page;

your userpage has been deleted, leaving the impression that this account is inactive; yet your contributions list shows otherwise.

please correct this? as per revelant wp

ty :)

(also, the link from your wmc account userpage points to your dead userpage here... )

Lx 121 (talk) 05:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

I believe that Guy has deleted his user page on purpose, in the belief that this will prevent hacking by the people who he has made enemies of over the years. HTH. Bastiche (talk) 13:28, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

- ha well i don't have a problem w that, but it should be redirected to the talkpage then. right now it's misleading; makes it look like the account is "dead" & it isn't. that violates policy; i don't intend to be pedantic about it, but users aren't allowed to play "hide & seek" with their user info on here, & the rule applies to everybody. Lx 121 (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  - What policy would that be? As far as I know, there's no reason that anyone needs to have a user page, and no requirement to have an inactive user page redirected. The talk page is active, that's the main thing. Tony Fox (arf!) 23:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
    - I agree with Tony Fox. There's no rule that Guy has to maintain a blue-link user page, and even if there were, it would be a good one to ignore. Guy does good work; we certainly don't mind if he wants a red-link user page. -GTBacchus^(talk) 18:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)