User talk:Jyothish.r

Hello, Jyothish.r, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bakilas (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Jobveno

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jobveno, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PureRED | talk to me | 14:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih ^Talk 15:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jyothish.r (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21401 was submitted on May 02, 2018 14:36:46. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:36, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jyothish.r (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Team, i have been a member of wikipedia for past 8 years, and i have not posted any promotional content before. It was a post regarding a new service offered, probably the references were not in English language. If you feel that it is promotional, i will not be posting it again.

Decline reason:

Your prior edits, as explained below, were clearly advertorial or soapboxing in nature and in over a week, you haven't responded to the question on what you intend to do. —SpacemanSpiff 11:53, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Alex ShihTalk 15:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

I must point out that, though your account might have been created eight years ago, you have only made four undeleted edits in total (including this unblock request), only one of which was to article space. In addition, you have made seven edits to two articles that were later deleted, one of which you created yourself which was speedy deleted as being promotional (for which you were blocked). Saying you have not posted any promotional content before seems a little disingenuous when you have actually posted as close to no surviving article content as you can get without it being actually none. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:17, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock discussion

Sorry, I'm not convinced that unblocking you would be wise. Some of your edits were not overly constructive such as edits to an article deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of karnataka, which looks to me like some sort of soapbox. That looks like the most prominent of your edits of old. You did add info cited to a subject's website, but that possible passed muster. Then of course there's Jobveno. What sort of constructive edits will you make? How will you recognize promotional editing so as not to produce more spam? Please state in your own words the meaning and intent of WP:RS and WP:IS. How do these relate to WP:N?--Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]