User talk:Jyothir Aditya

December 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mohammad Hamid Ansari, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. adding personal commentary and WP:OR into WP:BLPs DBig Xrayᗙ 20:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Baji Rao I, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 20:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rahul Gandhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

you have already made 3 reverts on Rahul Gandhi, So You are suggested to self revert and join the talk page discussion or else you risk being blocked. DBig Xrayᗙ 14:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rahul Gandhi. DBig Xrayᗙ 15:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have clearly stated facts rather than opinions on rahul gandhi talk page.

You are using your power as experienced editor to block me. rather than discussing with me on talk page. This is very unfortunate. -- Jyothir Aditya (talk) 15:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]