User talk:Jwalker1977

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RHYTHM Liqueur.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! KTC (talk) 23:30, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe calling it advertisment was too harsh. However, I stand by the decline decision as it stand. If you can provide some link to the reviews you are calling about, preferably as inline footnote references, that will certainly helps. The content as it stands also do not conform to Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Have a look at 1, 2 & 3 for some example of existing articles and its style. If you have any more question, do feel free to ask me at my talk page. -- KTC (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to also say, writing content straight from what you're told by the company spokeperson is considered original research. Wikipedia need reliable indepedent third party published sources, to establish notability and verifiability. -- KTC (talk) 00:33, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

That was so not what I meant. I'm afraid you actually made the article worse except for the better in referencing. I rewrote it based on what you've done and approved that. KTC (talk) 23:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rhythm (liqueur), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KTC (talk) 23:49, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't reverted your edit (yet), but I'm afraid that's not actually how Wikipedia work. The principles of Wikipedia among others are verifiability and neutral point of view. It is important that an article reflects a balance view, and not just what (in this case) the company want publicly portrayed. The information regarding the co-founders of the company is a simple matter of historical fact that's verifiable using the cited articles. As such, it is the policy of Wikipedia to include such information if the information is deem revelant and add something to the article, even if it may or may not reflect a company in a positive light. -- KTC (talk) 23:28, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]