User talk:Jwalantsoneji

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Baka man 00:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FormWare (programming language)

A tag has been placed on FormWare (programming language) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Book:Database Normalization

The book Book:Database Normalization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This book contains only one article. It is most likely a book created as a test, rather than a book meant to be read.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, books may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated book prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the talk page of the book.

Please consider improving the book to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated book prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and the miscellany for deletion process allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 08:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indian witch-hunt

Hi. I have some sympathy for yout view. WHen I first added the stat I tried looking through National Crime Bureau online resources and finally gave up. However, the fact it is in 2 independent reliable sources means it passes muster. I encourage you to raise it at a noticeboard such as the RS noticeboard or wherever, since as I say I have some sympathy for your view. That's if you can be bothered, of course. Cheers zzz (talk) 05:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Jwalantsoneji, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Umesh Waghmare, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 02:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jwalantsoneji, after your 'bulletification' the page looked like this. You deleted most of the content.

It should look like this. Please be more careful in future. 220 of ^Borg 03:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Umesh Waghmare,, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 03:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]