User talk:Jvguidi

Welcome!

Hello, Jvguidi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Drmies (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me! - Verifiable sources

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Would this ISBN - 978-85-915954-0-2 be considered a Verified Source for a list of dates predicted for apocalyptic events? Jvguidi (talk) 20:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this were a notable book, it might be okay to add some of its prophesies to the list. The list is already a questionable collection with no clear rules for inclusion. In general, you would want rules that at least require coverage in a secondary reliable source. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what "Verified source" is, but there is nothing on that page that suggests that that book is published by a reliable press. Drmies (talk) 01:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]