User talk:Jvas41

Welcome!

Hello, Jvas41, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Frenzie23 (talk) 22:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cade's Hypothesis (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cade's Hypothesis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cade's Hypothesis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jvas41! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 07:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cade's Hypothesis

Hello, Jvas41. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cade's Hypothesis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hello. I can see you've sent an email, but since I've been away from Wikipedia for a long time I no longer have access to the account that was registered with Wikipedia. I've now changed it, so you can send again, but personally I prefer to talk about Wikipedia on talk pages rather than by email. FlagSteward (talk) 02:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I added my comment to a comment on the Talk page. 2600:1700:45E9:1CC0:8DAA:DA56:467A:BACF (talk) 02:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which Talk page? I assume you're talking about this edit to Talk:List_of_Spanish–American_War_monuments_and_memorials? I don't see how any of that is addressed to me? I have no particular interest in the Spanish–American War, it was just one in a list of thousands of articles I've assessed recently. FlagSteward (talk) 02:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's the one. It's under the section "another Spanish one". 2600:1700:45E9:1CC0:8DAA:DA56:467A:BACF (talk) 02:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't understand. Remember I didn't see your email. That edit appears to be directed at another editor, I've not been involved in editing that article at all and I don't understand what you're expecting me to do. FlagSteward (talk) 05:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]