User talk:JvDuijn

May 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to ASM International, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Romartus Imperator (talk) 19:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at ASM International, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Romartus Imperator (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your message. Can you indicate what I did wrong. The reference was to an annual report of a publicly listed company. The changes were based upon this annual report. I do not understand how that interferes with the guidelines. (User:JvDuijn)

JvDuijn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JvDuijn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi JvDuijn! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:02, Thursday, May 28, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

COI check for ASM International

Hello. Do you have any connections to this company? It seems that most of your edits relate to it. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I obtained my PhD on an innovation and business history of this company in 2019 at Maastricht University (the Netherlands). The dissertation is titled ‘Fortunes of High Tech: An History of Innovation at ASM International’. In the sources of my Wiki-contributions, I refer to this publication as well.

109.37.130.31 (talk) 09:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur del Prado moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Arthur del Prado, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arthur del Prado

Hello, JvDuijn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arthur del Prado, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur del Prado (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arthur del Prado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Arthur del Prado has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Arthur del Prado. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 21:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur del Prado (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Scope creep were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a WP:BLP. It needs real WP:SECONDARY source ensure its notable. These are currently missing. What is there at the moment is fairly generic and routine. Also large sections are unsourced. BLP's with unsourced section either get deleted, stubbed or sent to back to Afc.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arthur del Prado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 08:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arthur del Prado

Hello, JvDuijn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arthur del Prado".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]