User talk:Juzer
Thank you for experimenting with the page Asghar Ali Engineer on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. --W.marsh 14:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 |
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content | |
|
Newcomers: Welcome kit |
Register: Indian Wikipedians |
Network: Noticeboard | Discussionboard
Browse: India | Open tasks |
Deletions
| ||
Commercial use of Image:MohammedAlitruth.jpg
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:MohammedAlitruth.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:MohammedAlitruth.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:MohammedAlitruth.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Da'i al-Mutlaq
[edit]See Talk:Da'i al-Mutlaq -- AnonMoos 11:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Adding google image links
[edit]Please revert your edits of adding google image links to the external link sections of many articles. Google image searches come up with many copyright violating links, which defile wikipedia's strict copyright policies and is against WP:EL. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- I was just coming to say the same thing. I'm actually going to revert all of them right now (won't take but a minute); please don't add any more links to any search engine results, per WP:ELNO. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Your edit at Anna Hazare
[edit]WP:BLPSTYLE guidelines and controversies section of the article clearly state "Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone. Do not give disproportionate space to particular viewpoints; the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all. - . Shlok talk . 05:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Your edit at Anna Hazare
[edit]WP:BLPSTYLE guidelines and controversies section of the article clearly state "Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone. Do not give disproportionate space to particular viewpoints; the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all. - . Shlok talk . 05:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Your edit at Anna Hazare
[edit]WP:BLPSTYLE guidelines and controversies section of the article clearly state "Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone. Do not give disproportionate space to particular viewpoints; the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all. - . Shlok talk . 05:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Image question
[edit]Juzer, where did you get the border on this image? Did you draw it from scratch? Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Could you please respond to this inquiry? Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Stampede Comment
[edit]Please do not remove content about the stampede at the funeral of Mohammed Burhanuddin, since it is mentioned highly enough to warrant it's inclusion in the article. Whether or not other similar stampedes are mentioned regarding other figures is of no relevance: if you would like to add these stampedes then by all means go for it.Fotoriety (talk) 01:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Afd notification
[edit]Greetings. You might be interested to know that the article "Alla Kushnir (dancer)" has been submitted for deletion due to its subject's lack of notability. -The Gnome (talk) 18:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mufaddal Saifuddin. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Juzer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Juzer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Juzer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)