User talk:Justwatchmee

Welcome

Hello, Justwatchmee, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Justwatchmee, good luck, and have fun. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Return from hiatus

Hello Justwatchmee. Thank you for adding the references to Welspun Energy. Can I ask what drew your attention to this article, since it doesn't seem like you've edited it before now?

Also, just wondering what inspired you to suddenly get involved with various AfD discussions in the past month or so, after not making any edits for about four years? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Justwatchmee. Could you please respond to my questions above? It seems that you have made other edits in the meantime. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MrsSnoozyTurtle Because I was on Wikipedia and felt like editing the page and the AfD process is a mindful way to spend my day. Justwatchmee (talk) 21:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same question, Justwatchmee. You participate a lot in AFD discussions and quote policies that an account with only 100 edits are unlikely to know about, much less know the abbreviations for.

What accounts did you edit with previously? If there were previous accounts, you should list them on your User page so that it's understood that you are not a returning blocked editor. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Liz I do participate in AFD discussion as I enjoy the AFD process as a mindful way to spend my day. The abbreviations to policy are mentioned within many of the AFD discussions with links to their descriptions. Should I be doing something differently?Justwatchmee (talk) 20:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: General Catalyst (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Herpetogenesis was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remember that this is an encyclopedia, not a promotional press release. Try to clean up wording such as:

"The firm makes capital investments and takes an active role in building up each company."

"Led a show of VC support"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:General Catalyst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 00:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Herpetogenesis Thank you for your comment and review. I've made the changes and a few more sources. Justwatchmee (talk) 12:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Frank (company) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Frank (company). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon Thank you for your comments and forward thinking about the disambiguation page. I agree. Justwatchmee (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfD comment

Hi, I just saw your comment on this AfD[1] and noticed that you posted it above the relisting notice. I didn't think it my place to cut and paste another editor's comment, but thought you might want to know so you could move it to the correct spot below the notice. Cheers! BBQboffin (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BBQboffin thank you so much for letting me know. That was very sweet. It looks like it's been moved. Thanks again :) Justwatchmee (talk) 18:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Frank (company)

On 13 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frank (company), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that student-aid startup Frank claimed to have 4.25 million users, but is alleged to have had fewer than 300,000? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frank (company). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frank (company)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith very cool! Thank you so much for letting me know :) Justwatchmee (talk) 14:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: General Catalyst (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Catalyst.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:General Catalyst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Justwatchmee! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:General Catalyst

Hello, Justwatchmee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "General Catalyst".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hemant Taneja (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dr vulpes was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hemant Taneja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]