User talk:Justppl

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Excuseme99 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced to multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring and sockpuppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Lastly, if you are editing an article about an individual or group of people, please adhere to Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 14:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbara Leigh

The article Barbara Leigh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 15:46, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justppl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not using sock puppy or whatever....I haven't been on here in almost a year and forgot my old username and password, so i made a new account

Decline reason:

You are blocked, for the inappropriate use of multiple accounts and for inappropriate edits. A change of username is not appropriate, since it is you, the person, who are blocked, and not any of the accounts you used. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justppl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My old account was blocked, tempoarily. I was debating with another user. The block expired recently so I came back to wikipedia. I didn't remember my old account username or password, so I made another account. I was not aware that this was against the rules. I will use this account and only this account if I am unblocked and enabled to edit pages in the future

Decline reason:

I agree with FisherQueen. You, the person, are not allowed to edit, not just whatever account(s) you've been editing from. –MuZemike 01:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Excuseme99 was never unblocked; here is the block log. The sockpuppet investigation confirms fifteen usernames and one ip address, not counting this one. Either your memory is extraordinarily poor, or you are not being entirely honest. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|You misunderstood me. That was the primary account I previously used. I created many different accounts, I was not aware that this was not allowed when I first did that. Sometimes I would log into a few of them actively. My IP adress was blocked for six months for sockpuppet. The block expired, so I presumed I was allowed to return. I am again blocked for sockpuppetting, even though this is the only account I have used since.

It seems you misunderstood. You were blocked indefinitely. IPs don't get blocked forever, since they are often reassigned to other users; six months is usually long enough to be sure the blocked user is finished making new accounts. In order to make a plausible case for unblocking, in addition to not creating any more sockpuppets, you'll also need to address the inappropriate content of your edits. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK....but I would like to know what was inappropriate about my edits. I did add some movie information, and some death details (with sources) and quotes.

Articles for deletion nomination of Barbara Leigh

I have nominated Barbara Leigh, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Leigh. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 02:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]