User talk:Justo Mendoza

In accordance with the guidelines of assignment #1 I am writing on your talk page. I am happy to be working with you again. Good luck in the course. Caitlinmcgrath (talk) 04:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Justo Mendoza, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Justo Mendoza! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission has been declined for one or more of the following reasons:

It is primarily designed to threaten, disparage or attack its subject.
It is a biography of a living person that is unreferenced and entirely negative in tone.
It is a page that is purely vandalistic in nature.

This page meets one or more of the general criteria for speedy deletion and may be deleted without notice. Users who continue to create inappropriate pages will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Justo Mendoza/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crowfoot

The Crowfoot article looks pretty good! Thanks for your work. May I suggest consolidating the references section? It's quite long with repeated use of the same book. You might take a look at the citations on the Theodore Roosevelt article to see how a heavily cited sources are consolidated. Also, ISBN numbers on the books would be useful. You might want to use {{cite book}}, {{cite web}} for your citations. They would generally go inside of the <ref>{{cite book ...}}</ref>. (I multi-posted this message on the recent Crowfoot editors talk pages) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jim! I took your suggestion and looked at the Roosevelt article for reference. I consolidated the sections of the article that I was responsible for. Thanks again. Justo Mendoza (talk) 14:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]