User talk:Justinian43

A tag has been placed on Rebelscum.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Rebelscum.com. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Exxolon 19:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC) or ==Rebelscum.com== A tag has been placed on Rebelscum.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.[reply]

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Rebelscum.com. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Exxolon 19:02, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Justinian43

Hello, I placed Justinian43 to be deleted because it is a copy of your userpage in an article. Hope you don't mind. Thanks. --_Hdt83 _Chat 18:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Byzantine Empire/East-Hem Maps

Hi Justinian43. Thank you for the compliment on the map. FYI, I've got a blank map available on my website (http://www.ThomasLessman.com/History/images/blank-East-Hem.jpg) that you can feel free to use for your own maps. I like this particular kind map because it shows the geography accurately, and when you add borders, etc. it gives you the impression of a modern-like border map. Kinda adds a neat twist and allows for more information for wiki-readers, IMHO. Respectfully, Thomas Lessman 14:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:0Aria_Giovanni1.0.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:0Aria_Giovanni1.0.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 20:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey great maps

Could you revise ur angeloi map cos the Byzantines had a little less land in the center of anatolia than ur map currently suggests. Please see Kilij Arslan II and his conquests as well as a history of Turkey to see that Byzantine grip on Anatolia was undermined in more than just the south.

Also, could you provide a reference for your maps? Thanks, and keep it up Basileus. Tourskin 05:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the changes to Byzantine-Ottoman Wars. I appreciate your efforts, but please do leave a note afterwards (preferably before) when you make a map change - a 1430 map is not better than a 1389 map for a section discussiong the years 1370 - 1390, no? Tourskin 03:37, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Byzantium1215.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Image-Byzantium1215.JPG. The copy called Image:Image-Byzantium1215.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great image

Wonderful. If its ok with you, I can add references for you later, but I think this should be in the byzantine empire article - well done. Tourskin 04:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1183

Hey I'm not trying to stalk you here but help you - this map is off because the Sultanate had taken much more land in 1182 after Manuel Komnenus Death:

Replacing existing maps

Hello, I think it's awesome that you are constructing maps for Wikipedia! However, it is probably not a good idea to replace pre-existing maps of higher quality when the resolution on these new maps is a bit lacking (i.e. the text is very difficult to read in some cases). I'm not trying to give you a hard time, but I, like you, want to make sure we have the highest quality graphics on this site. I encourage you to create novel maps that do not have a suitable graphic already in place. Kindest regards, AlphaEta ^{T / C} 03:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I really like the succession of maps that you've added to the Byzantine Empire article. Keep up the good work! AlphaEta ^{T / C} 03:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a list of userboxes on Wikipedia. Here are the history-specific userboxes. Finally, I'll put the Sassanid tag below. Hope this helps, AlphaEta ^{T / C} 03:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is interested in the
Sasanian Dynastic Empire.

No, I'm not an admin, but I'm sure you will be very soon if you keep working hard on those edits. Thanks, AlphaEta ^{T / C} 03:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be a decent chap

given the fact that you like ancient history and star wars.Hungerhahn (talk) 16:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

map -Byzantine under palaigai

Nice map, howeverm one littlke error. There was no "albania territory back then . The country was constructed in 1912. The area was all part od Dusan's Serbian Empire . Regards Hxseek (talk) 00:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rebelscum.com

I have nominated Rebelscum.com, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebelscum.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ecuador

Hi Justinian43. You listed yourself at Category:Ecuadorian Wikipedians and I thought that you might be interested in recent developments at WikiProject Ecuador. The WikiProject Ecuador banner recently was updated with a number of new parameters and most of the Ecuador article talk pages have been tagged with the banner. Please consider helping out with WikiProject Ecuador. Thanks! GregManninLB (talk) 14:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

welcome back!

Great!!! Look forward to seeing those maps my friend!Gabr-el 01:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Eastrome480AD.JPG

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Eastrome480AD.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sitemaker.umich.edu/mladjov/files/romana500.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Eastrome480AD.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Eastrome480AD.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Eastrome480AD.JPG and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Eastrome480AD.JPG with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Eastrome480AD.JPG.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you.

Maps

I wonder if I could upload your maps to Commons so that they can use in wikipedia Lusophone?(talk • contribs) --Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 01:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Byzantium-Angeloi.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Byzantines737.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Byzantium554.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Byzantiumafter2crusades.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!