User talk:Justice2day

Autobiographical editing by Dr. Geier

Dr. Geier, your contributions to the article are appreciated. Please be aware, however, that it may be very difficult for someone so intimately related to this article's topic to write entirely neutrally. It is for this reason that editors are strongly discouraged from writing their own biographies, though your participation on the article talk page – as you have been doing – is welcomed.

Please don't engage in an edit war over the content of this – or any – Wikipedia article. First and most importantly, it will not resolve any issues over disputed content. Second, it may result in a suspension of editing privileges.

Under the WP:BLP rules here, you may have certain rights, but you do not have a right to remove negative information just because it is negative. It must also be potentially libelous. Discuss such problems, edits, or deletions on the talk page first. -- Fyslee 10:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Other user IDs

This user has or does edit using the following user names:

The last one is a very serious matter, as it is a misuse of Kathleen Seidel's name. She is webmaster for neurodiversity.com. -- Fyslee 21:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The use of multiple user names violates this policy:

"Avoiding scrutiny from other editors"

"Multiple accounts should not be used as a way of avoiding the scrutiny of your fellow editors by ensuring you leave no audit trail. Using sock puppet accounts to split your contributions history means that other editors can't detect patterns in your contributions. While it may be legitimate to do this from time to time (for example, by creating a special account to make edits that might serve to identify you in real life), it is a violation of this policy to create multiple accounts in order to confuse or deceive editors who may have a legitimate interest in tracking your contributions."

-- Fyslee 05:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Please acquaint yourself with WP:COI policies and stop editing entirely if you are unwilling to comply. Violation of this policy is disruptive, selfish, and despicable. --208.59.93.238 (talk) 20:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both changes reverted

I've reverted both of your changes. Please read WP:DEADLINK - when a link has been previously verified, the material should not be removed if the link no longer works. In addition, the link that your removed on one of your changes claiming "Link Provided States, "File Not Found - The page that you have requested could not be found." is not dead, does work, and does pull up the article critical of Dr. Geier's work. [1]. Ravensfire (talk) 14:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

god bless

Whomever it is who "appears to be personally connected to Dr Geier", god bless. god bless. god bless.

sincerely and respectfully, Seipjere (talk) 17:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]