User talk:Justamanhere

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Justamanhere, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 08:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of San Luis Shrine Desecration (Mormons) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article San Luis Shrine Desecration (Mormons) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Luis Shrine Desecration (Mormons) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NellieBly (talk) 00:40, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --NellieBly (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Justamanhere

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hot Stop ^UTC 08:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted your user page as an attack page improperly defaming an entire religion and its founder. While users are given a fair amount of latitude on their user pages, given that pushing your extreme point of view was basically the entire purpose for your page, I believe that it falls under our definition of an WP:Attack page. If you create a new user page, you may include your opinions on it, but please understand that Wikipedia is not your blog or personal web site to explain how bad a particular religion is.

I'm also concerned about the editing you've been doing on LDS articles as well. Please review WP:NPOV and WP:OR, to understand how Wikipedia works more clearly. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is time for you to make a choice

Wikipedia has a very firm neutral point of view policy. It seems as though your opinions about the Mormon church are much too strong to allow you to edit about that subject in a neutral way. That's fine; many of us have subjects we avoid because it's hard for us to edit them neutrally. If you are most interested in helping make the encyclopedia better, I'll know that when I see edits from you that are fully neutral, fully sourced, and in subjects completely unrelated to this subject. For example, I've often thought that a motivated and skilled writer could make our Puppy article a lot better than it is. If, on the other hand, you are most interested in promoting your opinions about the Mormon church, that's something that you will be able to do more appropriately on your own web site or blog, but not at Wikipedia. If you're more interested in promoting your opinions than in making the encyclopedia better, I'll know that when I see edits from you that continue to try to push bias against Mormonism into the encyclopedia, and I'll help you relocate your opinions to your own web site or blog by blocking you from further editing at Wikipedia. I'll check in on your edits to see whether you've decided to be a useful encyclopedia editor or a blocked user. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About Wikipedia

Threats are a terrible way to induce an editor to contribute. Let me translate what you said:

1. [redacted]. Esspecially not when we are in the middle of a fund drive and are not making the $$$.

2. We are certainly going to allow them to only post materials 'approved' by the Church and we will threaten anyone else. i.e. look at this edit summary. 02:20, 26 December 2011‎ Fat&Happy (talk | contribs)‎ (116,847 bytes) (again rv POV-pushing addition; undue weight for individual actions not sanctioned by subject of article) (undo)

3. I have not posted anything that is not verifiable and accurate.

4. If you and I were talking face to face, I doubt you would resort to threats, and I know you would not so so brave. I have read the sites policies and what you have posted here is a 'legal threat'. I don't think you are permitted to do that.

5. I think you should apologize. I have done nothing other than state my views -- although they are not your views or the views of the majority.

6. [redacted].

7. [redacted] Please refrain from any further admin actions regarding my account [redacted].

Speedy deletion nomination of San Luis Shrine Desecration (Mormons)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on San Luis Shrine Desecration (Mormons) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NebY (talk) 15:46, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. I'll try again -- in my own words. Justamanhere (talk) 15:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated violations of WP:NPOV, WP:BATTLE and WP:IDHT. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 16:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justamanhere (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not done anything except ask questions. I will abide by wikipedias policies and only edit articles about orchids which I grow orchids because I am bisexual (and I am very handsome too -- or so I am told) and I will not say mean things about the mormons anymore -- even though what I say is verifiable. I recently improved this article Eulophia petersii and will only work on this type of content, which I enjoy, and which is not likely to get me into trouble. Justamanhere (talk) 16:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You most certainly have done plenty besides asking questions, and your insistence on claiming that your anti-Mormon hate speech is true and verifiable means it would be unwise to unblock you -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked your Talk page access, as you are abusing the purpose of having it - if you wish to make further unblock requests, see WP:BASC -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]