User talk:JustScience

April 2017

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fractal Expressionism, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. This would be your opinion only and is therefore not a legitimate reason to remove the templates. You need to discuss this on the talk page or, preferably, rewrite the article to comply with guidelines. freshacconci (✉) 17:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fractal Expressionism, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Which part of this do you fail to understand? You must discuss this on the talk page and/or make the required changes. Unilaterally removing the templates another editor added simply because you "think" it's fine is not permitted. Do not remove again until a discussion takes place, consensus is reached and changes to the article are made. freshacconci (✉) 18:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fractal Expressionism, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Hi there, I know you've already been told this, but I would like to further encourage you to use the talk pages when editing, so that other users may understand your rationale beyond the mere assertion that the "Page is accessible to average reader" in order that we may gather consensus. Please let me know what I can do to help improve the article with you. Kakurokuna (talk) 20:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]