User talk:JustOutlaw

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Fleeboi. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Metropolitan90 20:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

Okay, look. Because you asked politely, I'm going to be nice.

What was special about your gaming clan? How was it different from all the other gaming clans in the world? Why should anyone care? If you can tell me what was special about it, if you can provide a reason that someone who wasn't part of the clan would care, then I'll re-create it.

That is, a real reason. Not one that you made up. DS 21:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reason

Because one of the founding members Fleeboi died early this year due to a work related accident This is just my tribute to him and the clan he once loved!

I'm very sorry that your friend died, but this is not the way to commemorate him; one of our policies is, in fact, that Wikipedia is not a memorial. Perhaps if you worked on improving the articles about the games he liked to play? DS 21:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, as a new member to Wikipedia, I was un-aware of certain rules and regulations, sorry to have started of on the wrong foot.

Notability of Michael Locke

A tag has been placed on Michael Locke, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

I struck the above. Sorry for being hasty. I am not familar with the Dirty Sanchez movie. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Please look at the pages of some other movie starts for style and format. Please be sure to use verifiable sources, such as imdb, and articles from the entertainment press to document what you write about Micheal Locke. Thanks! Liberal Classic 22:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello JustOutlaw! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 42 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Michael Locke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 02:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]