User talk:JustMaria

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, JustMaria, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering with us. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

--TheParanoidOne 19:56, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I see you've finally established your userpage. Since you regularly contribute to wrestling related pages, I am inviting you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling. Just add your name to the members list and you're in. --JFred 00:38, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE ASSIST, WRESTLING FANS OF WIKIPEDIA

Me and the soon to be departing (hopefully not) Moe Epsilon are setting up a project to deal with the music of this great business. It will be Wikipedia:WikiProject Music of wrestling. Join if you are remotely interested - every little helps! Thanks. Kingfisherswift 17:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question about ECW's Ariel

This is concerning your edit to the WWE roster article. Lately... when has she read tarot cards? I don't watch ECW, but I read detalied recaps of it...and I've seen nothing about her doing that for quite a while. She read tarot on her first few appearances (a while ago), and that's it I believe. Why list a gimmick of her that doesn't even apply anymore? Maybe she will read cards again someday, but I somehow doubt it. RobJ1981 00:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops sorry, I didn't read the WWE roster talk page. She only does it on WWE.com, I don't think that's notable enough to mention. Many wrestlers do things on WWE.com from what I remember, I don't think it's needed to list their internet jobs on a roster page. Post it on Ariel's page (if it's not there already) and leave it at that. JBL writes things on WWE.com, but it certainly shouldn't be listed on the roster page. RobJ1981 00:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cut it out

Please review WP:OWN and stop treating articles as if you own them, reverting any edits you didn't personally make.«»bd(^talk _stalk) 21:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate external links

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Brooke Adams (model). Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Yamla 17:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Amy Zidian

An editor has nominated Amy Zidian, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Zidian (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 08:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WM 23 matches

Please stop adding the Hall of Fame (2007) inductees to the match section. It does not belong there. If you wish, please put it in Notes.

Forgive me if I am wrong, but I seemed to have noticed that you did add in the Hall of Fame. I don't want to argue over it, but just want to address that it doesn't belong in the matches section.

I apologize, did not see them in the previous WMs. Socby19 00:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)SocBy19[reply]

Diva Roster List

The list is fine with the males linked. There's no harm and it's rather expected. You mentioned that not being done on the WWE roster page. There's no need as the males' names are listed there already. So it would be repetative and double linking. RabidWolf 02:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

people that visit that article has the search box to the left

You could say that about anything that is linked. And by it, all pages would just be text, sources and the occasional picture(s) with no linking. RabidWolf 04:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:March Mayhem.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:March Mayhem.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PWA Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PWA Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Michelle under GA review

Hi there, I see that you are a primary contributor to the article Candice Michelle. This article has come under review for Good article reassessment as part of GA Sweeps and problem has been identified and listed on the talk page. Please begin to address this point in the next seven days or the article will be delisted from GA and will have to go through the GAN process all over again to regain its status once improvements have been made. If you have any questions, please drop me a line.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]