User talk:JustJust51

Welcome!

Hello, JustJust51, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 19:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Germanicus trilogy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to World in Conflict, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Edits that add content shouldn't generally be marked as minor. Also can you add edit summaries to your future edits for the convenience of other editors? Alcherin (talk) 15:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm RedPanda25. Your recent edit to Commando Order appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Red Panda 25 13:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JustJust51. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Note: of the almost 1200 edits you've made to date, 96% of them do not have an edit summary. Please read the attached (linked) guidelines to learn to contribute more effectively. Thank you

Additional note

You were also notified of this issue just this past October (see above). As that other editor requested; "Also can you add edit summaries to your future edits for the convenience of other editors?" - I second that. - ^theWOLFchild 15:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Advanced Combat Helmet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to UCP

Don Willett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bush Presidential Library

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social apartheid in Brazil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wage gap (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie Wilson's War (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have been repeatedly asked to use edit summaries and to stop adding unnecessary links to articles. What part of these requests do you not understand? The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 17:03, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to The Newsroom (U.S. TV series), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hannibal Rising (film), you may be blocked from editing. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 18:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries (3rd notice)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Note: You have twice been previously notified about your failure to provide edit summaries when making changes to articles, the last notification being on 12 December 2017. Since that time, you have made almost 1,000 edits, and as far as I can tell, you have not added a single edit summary to any of them. Further, despite several warnings here on your talk page, you haven't replied to any of them, nor have any of your 2,000+ edits to date been to any talk page, article or user. If there some reason why you refuse to engage in any content discussion, acknowledge any issues with your behaviour or describe any of your edits with a summary? Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and communication is a key component to collaboration. Please keep this in mind, as well as the policies & guidelines of this project, going forward. Thank you - ^theWOLFchild 18:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 16:03, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have blocked your account indefinitely for failing to respond to the above feedback. Regards, Swarm ♠ 02:39, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]