User talk:JustHelping614

Welcome!

Hello, JustHelping614, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Bamyers99 (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Bamyers99 (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dunning–Kruger effect

Hello. This is in response to your latest edits. I had previously asked you in my own edit summary to please initiate discussion on the article talk page instead of just re-doing the edit, and to read the essay WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. If you have not yet had a chance to do so, might I suggest you read that essay now? As a general rule, if an edit you made is reverted, you are expected to discuss the edit rather than repeating it. The objective is to avoid an edit war.
From reading your edit summaries, I still don't follow the rationale for your edit. Taking part in a talk page discussion would allow you a better opportunity to explain clearly, without the constrained space offered by an edit summary. Since you have chosen not to initiate the discussion, I have done so myself. I'd appreciate it if you would add your comments at Talk:Dunning–Kruger effect#Order of sentences in first paragraph. Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 19:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]