User talk:Just-2-Kool

Welcome!

Hello, Just-2-Kool, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Piper Reese, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FlyingToaster 06:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Back

Hello, Just-2-Kool! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Oliver Twisted 07:32, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Piper Reese

Hi. I just wanted to stop by to thank you for uploading such a great article. This is much better than the first 2 drafts of this article, and notability is clearly established. If you encounter any problems, let me know and I will do what I can to support you. Best regards. --Oliver Twisted (Talk) 05:14, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've communicated with the editor who flagged Piper Reese for CSD A7. The Speedy Deletion tag placed on the article was exchanged for a PROD WP:PROD. This will give you a chance to build an argument for notability on the article talk page. I would suggest utilizing any press references, both online and in print to which you have access. When possible, you can use quotations from sources in snippets on the article talk page to build your case. The Baltimore Sun, and Parenting sources are an excellent start. The more sources you can produce, the better your case will be. If you get a chance, you might want to request some assistance from User:fvv, who has admin status. Best regards. --Oliver Twisted (Talk) 05:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Piper Reese

Hello again, Fvw...Well, I'm stressed out and worn out now :-)

I got the page back up and OliverTwist gave me a great message on it. Then, another user marked it for Speedy Deletion. OliverTwist helped out and the status is now set for deletion in a few days. I think I've added enough content that I can remove the tags for deletion, but I don't want to ruffle any feathers as a newbie on wiki editing. OT suggested seeking your advice/help!

Do you think I'm justified in removing the tags setting the page for deletion now?

Thank you so much!--Just-2-Kool (talk) 06:46, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Deletion tags should generally say whether you can remove them from the article yourself or not. All the deletion tags are gone now, if any more appear that aren't clear to you, please ask again. --fvw * 08:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yes, the tag said I could - but I didn't know if I...well...should. I really appreciate the help!--J2K (talk) 15:35, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

inre: User talk:MichaelQSchmidt#Piper Reese

What you might consider is expanding the Piper Reese article by including a well sourced "==Podcasts==" section detailing the show itself with a few asides on Piper's inspiration for the show, and explanation of the show's beginnings and future. This way it will strengthen the article about Piper. Study Template:Cite web to see how to set up the citations, and WP:RS to understand what it takes to make a source. And tose "sources" you find which do not fit that mold can go down to external links. Good luck. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 16:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anything containing info like that would only be in the show notes on PipersPicks.TV, but I thought that would not be a proper source since it's the site for the show itself (even though the article is Piper Reese). I was concerned that listing the podcast episodes would look like an advertisement and get the article booted. Thanks for your help again!--J2K (talk) 17:29, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:PiperReese.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:PiperReese.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC) --Peripitus (Talk) 06:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I've updated the image page to show it as self-made. Happy editing - Peripitus (Talk) 20:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your February 2009 edits

Please read the policy on external links, and more specifically link spam. (Adding links to the same external site over a multitude of articles is severly frowned upon.) If you were acting in good faith, then review this article to see some guidelines to follow in the future. Seeing as you have been involved with various articles pertaining to the young subject, you may also need to avoid having a conflict of interest in your edits. SpikeJones (talk) 14:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is misleading to label the edits "spam edits" since the edit were done in a a good-faith attempt to solve some issue generated by a bot. Defamation laws do apply online. I tried asking for help when the edits I made were removed. Actually, I asked about it on your talk page. I did not receive a response. I'm just trying to make the proper changes, but the bot, which appears to be the subject of some debate iself, links to ambiguous explanations.J2K (talk) 15:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Piper interviewing Selena Gomez at House of Blues in Hollywood, Jan 2012.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Piper interviewing Selena Gomez at House of Blues in Hollywood, Jan 2012.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]