Jump to content

User talk:Jusdafax/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15

Sport in Leeds

My edit to Sport in Leeds was constructive. Please be more careful with Huggle and remove the incorrect warning from my talk page. Thank you 2A02:C7D:89A3:F400:D40F:B6AB:30EF:A52F (talk) 02:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

The edit summary "update" was not particularly informative, and I saw a club name change by a new unregistered editor, so it looked like one of hundreds of such edits which are vandalism. After nearly a decade as a Wikipedian, I do indeed take such matters seriously, and am exceptionally carefull, I assure you. I will remove the warning at your request, but I have a question for you in turn. Your reply appears to indicate a familiarity with Huggle and Wikipedia in general. Have you previous experience as a Wikipedian, and if so, why edit while not logged in? Jusdafax 02:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the huggle message as requested. To answer your question, I gave up editing Wikipedia as a user many many years ago and I now only occasionally edit from my IP, but my IP tends to change periodically for reasons only known to Sky Broadband. Happy editing 2A02:C7D:89A3:F400:D40F:B6AB:30EF:A52F (talk) 02:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Fair enough. Sorry about the miscue, and Happy New Year! Jusdafax 02:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Editing

Okay man, that wasn't cool. If you thought that the summaries of the series wasn't adequate then why don't you do it yourself? At least I gave summaries to let others know instead of what you haven't done. At least I was helping unlike you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.192.21 (talk) 14:15, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

I have deleted the Huggle warning on your Talk page. May I suggest you use edit summaries, especially when deleting blocks of content? This helps prevent reverts like the one that you refer to. Feel free to edit the article. Jusdafax 03:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Universal Health Services edit

Hello! I'm a new-ish editor and am wondering what the standard is for credible sources. You reverted my addition to the summary of Universal Health Services' article that described the controversies about them. How should I improve the controversies section or the summary to meet Wikipedia's standards? Theoriginalandrewia (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

  • As I mentioned in the edit summary, WP:RS covers a lot of the requirements Wikipedia asks of content additions such as the material I reverted. Is there proof that these statements are sourced reliably? Read the link carefully, and if there are sources to back your claims that are in major newspapers or other media, reference them in the article to back up your statement. This is not to say the edit is automatically going to stand, but it's a solid start. I'm sure you understand why this is needful for an online encyclopedia. Best wishes! Jusdafax 05:32, 4 January 2017 (UT

Reverted page

Hi, I am an actual member of this team. This list is not only incorrect, but is part of our private records and is not meant to be published. Please do not revert it. Thank you

  • According to the first sentence in the Gator Guard Drill Team article, the team is "nationally recognized" which implies a certain amount of transparency is to be expected. However, I have no interest in this subject, and thought I was merely reverting vandalism. On the chance you are who you claim to be, and operate from pure motives, I will abide by your request. Best wishes, Jusdafax 03:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Super FX

Exactly what's wrong with it? Comanche series leads to a dab page -- 65.94.168.229 (talk) 07:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Este Lauder - do not revert

Do not revert the corrected URL again. Check and see -- the previous one was wrong, what I found and put it is c-o-r-r-e-c-t. Check before you do more damage by random reversals.

  • I checked carefully, before and after. My revert restored the infobox photo at Estée Lauder, which you had vandalized. The other change, to the URL, appears to have no effect either way, though it may be a Hungarian spelling. At this point, given your rudeness, familiarity with Wikipedia for your seeming very first IP edits, lack of signature which given the statement above appears deliberate, and bold assertions that are demonstrably untrue, my assumption has to lean towards you being an editor who is at best of dubious value. I'm willing be proved wrong, 50.233.53.98, but if I am right, by drawing attention to yourself in this fashion, you do yourself a disservice. Jusdafax 01:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Free-Will Defense

Hello,

I would like to talk about the last edit on the page for Plantinga's Free-Will Defense. In the final sentence of the header, it mentions hat John Mackie conceded that Plantinga's defense had solved the problem of evil as he stated it, but I'd like to point out that this claim is false. I will quote from a passage in "The Miracle of Theism":

"This is a particularly subtle attempt to solve the problem. It defends God's goodness and omnipotence on the ground that (on long enough view) this is the best of all possible wolds, because it includes the important second-order goods, and yet it admits that real evils, namely the first-order ones, occur. It reconciles these apparently incompatible theses by, in effect, modifying one of our additional premises. It denies that a wholly good being would eliminate evil as far as he could, but explains this denial by pointing to a reason why a being who is wholly good, in a sense that is thoroughly intelligible to us and coherent with ordinary concept of goodness, might not eliminate evils, even though it is logically possible to do so and though he was able to do whatever is logically possible, and was limited only by the logical impossibility of having the second-order good with out the first-order evil. This defense is formally possible, and its principle involves no abandonment of our ordinary view of the opposition between good and evil, we can concede that the problem of evil does not, after all, show that the central doctrines of theism are logically inconsistent with one another. But whether this offers a real solution of the problem is another question. Let us call an evil which is explained and justified in the proposed way an "absorbed" evil. For example, some bit of suffering which is actually the object of kindness or sympathy whose goodness outweighs the badness of that suffering itself will be an absorbed evil, as will be miseries or injustices that are in fact progressively overcome by a struggle whose nobility is a higher good which outweighs the evils without which it could not have occurred. What this defence shows, the, is that the existence of completely absorbed evils is compatible with the existence of an omnipotent and wholly good god. But then the vital question is this: can the theist maintain that the only evils that occur in the world are absorbed evils? When this question is squarely put, it is surely plain that he cannot. On the one hand there are surplus first-order evils, suffering and the like which are not actually used in any good organic whole, and on the other there are second-order evils; these will not be incorporated in second-order goods, but will contrast with them: malevolence, cruelty, callousness, cowardice, and states of affairs in which there is not progress but decline, where things get worse rather than better. The problem, therefore, now recurs as the problem of "unabsorbed" evils, and we have as yet no way of reconciling their existence with that of a god of the traditional sort This brings us to the best known move in theodicy, the free will defense: evils - that is, as we can now say, unabsored evils - are due entirely to bad free choices made by human beings and perhaps by other created beings that have free will. But how is this a defence? Why would a wholly good and omnipotent god give human beings - and also, perhaps, to angels - the freedom which they have misused?" (p. 154-155)".

As you can see, Mackie doesn't even start discussing the Free-Will Defense until after the paragraph sited that stated that he conceded to Plantinga the soundness of the defense.

Thank you for reading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:33D1:A130:9D5F:69C3:E995:B879 (talk) 01:23, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

  • I have no opinion about the material you present here, and the fact remains that you deleted sourced material without extending the courtesy of explaining why in the box provided for an edit summary. May I gently suggest you do so in the future, especially should you desire to continue deletions in such a fashion? I'd suggest taking this discussion to the article talk page, thanks. Jusdafax 01:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

New York Life article

I saw that you restored its Criticism and Controversy section. I'm not the one who deleted it, but I'm not sure the "well-researched" justification fits that particular text. See the article's Talk page. I left the main page alone. – 2*6 (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

reverting my page info

hey man, i noticed you reverted my changes to my wiki page. i was just setting the record straight and getting rid of all the mistakes.

to prove it, please go to my linkedin page and send me an email.. https://www.linkedin.com/in/razmig-mavlian-b82bb01a?trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile

~ Razmig Mavlian

  • The place to discuss such matters is the article Talk Page, or here. I reverted because your wholesale changes included a massive deletion that you failed to write an explanation for in the edit summary box. It now appears you relocated the material. I get that you are a new user, and may not understand that that type of deletion, called "unexplained removal of sourced content," appears to a vandal fighter be a vandal at work. (In addition, when communicating in this manner, it's considered useful to sign your posts, as explained, with 4 of these ~ tilde symbols, which auto sign you. No biggie, just pointing it out in case you decide to edit and communicate in the future.) I will undo my revert, and wipe the warning on your page. Wikipedia is generally a friendly place, if you follow a few simple guidelines. Welcome aboard! Jusdafax 05:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Untitled

Last time i Checked the Bulgarian Commerce Register the owner of CSKA-Sofia was a legal firm called "PFC CSKA-Sofia". I hope you are bulgarian, so you can see it clearly, but my job is to provide proof, not translate it. I'm sending you a screenshot of the search I did in the Commerce Register. If you still do not believe me after you see it, ask someone to translate it for you.

File:Cska.png

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Y.Yotov (talk • contribs) 13:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Untitled

I was just trying to add my name to google employee list Iuliia Kozubek Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by I89koz (talk • contribs) 09:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

  • There were several problems with your first edit to Wikipedia. First off, you are trying to add yourself to a Category, not an article. Perhaps you noticed that your name appeared different than the other names, with no link. That's because they have Wikipedia articles about them. Since it appears you do not have one written about you, adding your name there won't work. This sort of thing comes up a lot at this website, and the bottom line is simply that it's an encyclopedia, not a blog or an employee directory, and has notability requirements and must be sourced via WP:RS. I hope this helps you understand my revert. Best wishes, Jusdafax 20:56, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Note

Thanks for the note about your enforcement request at AE today. It was all over so quickly; sorry I missed my chance to participate as I was out in the winter sunshine with my family. However, please now be notified that I wish for you never to post to my talkpage again. Even in the event of another jolly to AE, I'm sure someone else will take care of that on your behalf, it appears that many people are watching out for these kinds of posts at AE. All the best! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry

Two of my friends logged into my computer, in which I was currently logged into Wikipedia with. I'm sorry for any concerns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chewiebaccas (talk • contribs) 00:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fake news website

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fake news website. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Extreme Metal

So I was looking at a bands page on this site and I noticed a "1" hovering on the bell icon, so I click it and see my edits had been changed on the extreme metal page, when they clearly added more information and understanding to the article. (That Metal Head (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC))

  • I have undone my revert and the warning on your page. Your second edit to the page appeared to be vandalism as you had no edit summary, unlike your first which I missed. Since you deleted on the second, it looked like a common case. My apologies, and happy editing! Jusdafax 05:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Oh okay and thank you. That Metal Head (talk) 07:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox song

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox song. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

RfC on "No paid editing for Admins" at WT:COI

I've relisted an RfC that was run at WT:Admin in Sept. 2015. It is at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Concrete proposal 3 as there are a number of similar proposals going on at the same place. Better to keep them together. Smallbones(smalltalk) 04:21, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Edit to "La Caricature (1830–1843)"

Hi! My edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La%20Caricature%20%281830%E2%80%931843%29&diff=763930059 was the correction of a minor typo -- the name "Philipon" was mis-spelled "Philipot" This seemed constructive to me at the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C438:48A0:DCDC:733C:D7C7:1BCB (talk) 02:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Untitled

The information I have posted on Rick Kriseman Wikipedia is a fact. It is an important part of his legacy to the city and surrounding area. If you require sources I'll be more than happy to provide them. https://tampabayguardian.com/2016/09/21/sewage-scandal-mayor-follows-duke-energy-lead/ here a quick one for you. Should you actually care about the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PirateDiesel (talk • contribs) 06:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

  • First off, it appears in your haste to post on my page you neglected to place the post correctly, as I ask at the top, but also to sign it, as the bot has done for you. Since your tone is less than cordial, you begin with a disadvantage.
Your post was reverted primarily because of the tone, which was unencyclopedic, and because it was unsourced. Additionally, you posted with "Added content" as an edit summary, which is of limited value. The edit screen is quite helpful when it comes to adding references, so I suggest you take note. But at a deeper level, please read WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS to get a better understanding of the problems you face as a new editor. You may want to discuss the pollution issue on the politician's Talk page. Editing on Wikipedia is done by consensus. To do so, a good attitude is useful. Good luck to you. Jusdafax 06:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Put it back! :( i cri — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.212.10 (talk) 03:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Temp Heading, Simply Adressing

Hi there. You messaged me saying that you reverted the change I made to the page for the 1998 film Dark City. I have no qualms with that however I wish to explain why I made the change.

On the disambiguation page for 'Dark City' [[1]], the 1998 film is listed as an "American-Ausralian science-fiction film".

It is also listed as an Australian film on the list of Australian films of 1998 [[2]].

Due to the fact that the actual page for the film simply listed it as an American work, I simply edited the page to include Australia as a part of the film's production, as other related Wikipedia pages seem to indicate. If you feel I was presumptuous or incorrect in my edit, I have no qualms in the page being reverted to the previous state.

I would like to add I am not sure why the change would not be considered 'constructive,' unless specific evidence was required.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.188.124.31 (talk) 05:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

  • I beat you to a self-revert and Talk page removal of your warning about 15 minutes before your post here. I usually go over my edits, and this one was wrong, though in my defense "Updated information" is sometimes used by vandalizing IP editors as an edit summary. In any case, cheers and Happy Editing. Jusdafax 05:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Recent Edit on Cambria CA page.

Dear Jusdafax,

Im sorry that I have lead you to believe that my recent edit on the Wikipedia page dedicated to the village of Cambria on the Central Coast was non-constructive. The edit was made to show the current mayor of our beautiful town.

Sincerely,

The People of Cambria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CambrianDudeLOL (talk • contribs) 06:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Untitled

Since you're not a Wikipedia Admin, please desist from acting in the role of one, by changing edits you find "Unconstructive" Quote:NOTE: Though active in anti-vandalism here, I am not a Wikipedia administrator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danthemanff7 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Your comment, which you erroneously place at the top despite the clearly worded instructions not to do so, has been relocated to the proper spot on my Talk page. The Wikipedia requirements for text additions of the sort you wish to make to the article in question are set forth in WP:RS, which I suggest you read carefully before further edits of the sort I have now reverted twice. My non-admin status, which you are attempting to make an issue of, has no bearing on the matter. Unconstructive is a polite term for your dubious additions, and I also suggest you review WP:NPOV to gain further clarity. Jusdafax 20:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Untitled II

Hey Justdafax, just wanted to give you a shout out for your long-time contributions on Wikipedia!

Personally, I find it quite pleasant to see how everything just keeps growing, but disappointing to see how much time, effort and energy is consumed by actually deleting mediocre contributions, for whatever reasons... Anyhow, Cheers, and keep up the good works. 

~Undersigned Unsigned  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.47.205.124 (talk) 16:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Reverted Geno Auriemma edit

Hello - you recently reverted my edit to the Geno Auriemma article which changed the colorization for this year's record from "Conference regular season champion" to "Conference regular season and conference tournament champion" as you felt it wasn't constructive. I'm confused by this, as UCONN won the AAC championship last night (http://www.espn.com/ncw/recap?gameId=400945729). What was your objection to updating to the current state?

  • Being unfamiliar with "confboth" as a designation, it appeared to be vandalism, and since your change had no edit summary and was made by an unregistered user editing for the first time, it fit the profile. Had you made even a brief edit summary, I would have known what was up. May I suggest you do so next time? I have removed the warning on your Talk page. Best wishes, Jusdafax 14:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

I have a question

I had seen that you had reverted my edit to 9800 and you said that it was not constructive. I was wondering how what I had added was not constructive? I was writing the details about that year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98th Century (talk • contribs) 23:20, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

  • It's a disambiguation page, not an article about the year in question, so adding all that material is in fact unconstructive. Additionally, I suggest deletion of the nav box with the numerous red links. That is not how those things work. Jusdafax 23:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

I fixed the problem. I created a disambiguation page for that number so that there is now a page for that year. It is written the same way as 200 (which has both a disambiguation page and a page for that year).

FYI, this above user is very likely a sockpuppet. Home Lander (talk) 03:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Nobby's Nuts

Hello,

I made an edit to the Nobby's Nuts page. In Australia where this product originated it has used the catch phrase 'Nibble Nobby's Nuts' for decades to the point it is part of Australian shared conciousness and a running joke that has lasted near 30 years.

If the article contains a line about what the advertising slogan for the English product was, which by all accounts wasn't a big deal or very memorable, why would remove text that outlines such a long lasting and famous Australian advertising slogan for the product? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.6.69.2 (talk) 04:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

What would be the best way to reference it? It's written on the packet, can I just link to a picture of that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.6.69.2 (talk) 04:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Salinity edit

I changed the word from "pure" to "pore" because that is the direct quote from the Pinet text, referring to pore water burial in seafloor sediments.

Battle of Gettysburg

Hi Jusdafax. I'm not sure why you did this. I've changed it to a regular internal link, but considering your edit summary I have the feeling I may be missing something. RivertorchFIREWATER 12:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Omamori edit

Hi Jusdafax,

I'm replying to the comment you left on my talk page in January. Sorry for the delay in response, I don't use Wikipedia very much but would like to start editing and contributing more frequently!

My justification for this edit is clarification. In the original version, "these" is a pronoun that refers to omamori, but I didn't think that was clear if someone had skipped directly to the section. Thus, I changed "these" to "omamori." Of course, you have been doing this a lot longer than I have, and you have much more experience, so I defer to your judgment.

Thanks! - Mcreates — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcreates (talk • contribs) 17:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

I support your concerns about Paid editing. I prefer not to add to the very long discussion at Jimbo's page. If there is an WP:RfC or other discussion of policy change where I can express my opinion, please let me know. Feel free to ping me. I don't think there is much I can say at Jimbo's page to help at this point because of TL;DR. --David Tornheim (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Why?

Why you delete?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.133.3 (talk) 11:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

GoldFinger Response

So if you look up the Wiki page for "The Man from UNCLE", you will see references to discussions that Sam Rolfe had with Ian Fleming before naming his character 'Napoleon Solo'. There are other references to this communication and also this origin for the name of the original Man from Uncle, in books related to the TV Show.

As the references to Fleming and Goldfinger are so pronounced within the MFUNCle Wiki page, I was thinking it would not be out of place to enter a reference backwards from Goldfinger to MFUNCLE.

That was my rationale. Not just experimenting, but an attempt to improve the page by adding a (I believe) proven connection.

Deal with these comments as you so desire.

Thanks,

Trivia Goof (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

North Sentinel Islands edit

Hi Thanks for your message. I am not sure what would qualify as constructive, but I just deleted and ridiculously false claim backed up by an unreliable source. I believe you might not be too familiar with Maratha navy but it was a local coastal force which limited it's operations to a portion of west Indian coast. It didn't even have any ships capable of sailing to Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Regards, Ash > Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to North Sentinel >Island— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have >any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.56.187.146 (talk) 10:20, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit of Andrew Mason's page

Hi Jusdafax:

I don't understand why you removed my edit of Andrew Mason's page. It was not vandalism, and I was not experimenting.

I was reading the article I cited and saw the info that I added to his page. It - those particular items - made me curious about him, so I looked him up. Wikipedia did not have the info I found interesting, so I added it. I think it provides insight into both Mason's personal life and the genesis of his businesses.

I am not a frequent editor at Wikipedia, so it took me some effort to actually get it to work. It seems the system tagged my edit as 'not constructive' due to the word 'suck.' When I put an asterisk in it allowed the edit, and then subsequently allowed me to replace the asterisk.

I guess that you removed my edit after receiving a notification about 'suck.' I expect you just did this by rote, without ever bothering to look at the content I had added. But, you know, when the New York Times uses the word in a headline, it seems a bit dumb to have to remove it from a citation of the article.

Aside from your boilerplate explanation which impugns my motives, is there some other reason why you think the info I added should not be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:AA16:3601:7680:D0DA:D144:5AAC:4451 (talk) 23:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

AWB

Saw you got AWB for putting WikiProjects on Talk pages.. can you tell me how you figured out how to do that? SEMMENDINGER (talk) 00:14, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedians who meet the requirements can request AWB at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser. Best wishes, Jusdafax 06:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Yeah I have it, I'm asking how you made it work with adding WikiProject templates! Thanks! SEMMENDINGER (talk) 16:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Untitled

COMMENT hello, in regards to your post to disambiguation page, BILL WALLACE, this has a LINK ADDED,please Do not go around calling someone or christening someone a"VANDAL" without consenus, this is a defamation of ones rights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.12.178 (talk) 06:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

I stand by the revert, since your "link" is a Wikilink to a hospital. You reference a presumably real person with no indication of notability and no references, which is clearly unencyclopedic and in violation of WP:BLP. Jusdafax 06:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Okay fair enough, it is not relating to the person or uncited, but please dont call someone a vandal, as they may be doing what they think is right and out of good faith and is not a nice thing to say — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.12.178 (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Please sign your posts. Notice the wording on the message on your page. I do not call you anything. Jusdafax 06:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Dale righter

What was wrong with "in July 2017 righter was the sole rebulican to vote for the largest income tax increase in Illinois state history" all of that is factual. Why was that deleted? 208chuck (talk) 12:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Because you changed his party affiliation to Democratic 4 times elsewhere in the article. You want the information in the article? Source it properly and don't change his party, out of what now appears to be sarcastic spite. Jusdafax 15:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Huntley, Illinois

See the history--this article has a long, long history of promotional edits. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Missing your wisdom

Just saying. Atsme📞📧 19:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I very much appreciate your good opinion. Jusdafax 13:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Brent Venables

Hello,

I made the change because this is what shows in the first section:

{{Infobox college coach | name = Brent Venables | image = | alt = | caption = | sport = Football | current_title = [[Head Football Coach] | current_team = University of Arkansas | current_conference =SEC | current_record = | contract = | birth_date = December 18, 1970 (age 46) | birth_place = Salina, Kansas | death_date = | death_place = | alma_mater = | player_years1 = 1989–1990 | player_team1 = Garden City CC | player_years2 = 1991–1992 | player_team2 = Kansas State | coach_years1 = 1993–1995 | coach_team1 = Kansas State (GA) | coach_years2 = 1996–1998 | coach_team2 = Kansas State (LB) | coach_years3 = 1999–2003 | coach_team3 = Oklahoma (Co-DC/LB) | coach_years4 = 2004–2011 | coach_team4 = Oklahoma (DC/LB) | coach_years5 = 2012–present | coach_team5 = Clemson football (DC/LB) | overall_record = | bowl_record = | tournament_record = | championships = Oklahoma Sooners (2000 national championship) Clemson Tigers (2016 national championship) | awards = Broyles Award (2016) Rivals Defensive Coordinator Award (2015) | coaching_records = }} Thomas Brent Venables (born December 18, 1970) is an American college football coach. He is the defensive coordinator at Clemson University.[1]


This looks like it is a screw-up with the formatting so I removed it. This was also because the information is incorrect and says he is the current head coach of the University of Arkansas, which he is not. He is a candidate for the job but is still currently the defensive coordinator for Clemson.

Thank you for the explaination. I have reverted the article to an earlier version so the infobox formatting is restored. The person editing before you messed it up. I mistook your edit for vandalism because there was no edit summary. Welcome to Wikipedia. Most of us are friendly, and if you like editing, there are various tutorials on breaking in. Good luck and best wishes! Jusdafax 03:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

jesus, what iz yor problm

Your population statistics about country/state Serbia is false and misleading, thats why I changed it. The creation of Serbia(country/state/modern Serbia if you will) is not the same as knezevina(principality). almost half the country is missing. Serbia was torn between turkish empire and habsburgmonarchie. regards, aljosa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aljosa12345678910 (talk • contribs) 07:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia has certain protocols. One is to sign your Talk page comments, but that’s a small matter. More importantly is the need for edit summaries on big changes to articles, which is noted specifically in the messages I left on your Talk page. There are hundreds of other Wikipedians who will do exactly the same as I did. Now, you can stop your repeated unexplained deletions and make your case on the article Talk page, or you can continue down the same path that most likely leads to you being blocked from further editing. I suggest the former. Best wishes, Jusdafax 08:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

you changed my edit

how dare you change my edit, it suggested that the books were good and that people should read them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.46.200.21 (talk) 23:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We are not a blog, but an encylopedia and we present facts, not suggestions. Cheers, Jusdafax 23:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)


iowa vs purdue

I deleted the content because I was sure the page was going to be deleted anyways. since iowa is Purdue's most hated rival I did feel it was adequate to make a page about the history of the games between iowa and purdue. we as fans are hoping that in the near future that there will be a trophy accompanying the winner of this game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Budde85 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Yes it seems headed for deletion. I’ll pass over the rest except to suggest you use edit summaries when making big changes to articles, even ones that may not be around long. Thanks, Jusdafax 02:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jusdafax. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Jusdafax|<font color="green">Jus</font>]][[User talk:Jusdafax|<font color="C1118C">da</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Jusdafax|<font color="#0000FF">fax</font>]] : Jusdafax

to

[[User:Jusdafax|<span style="color: green;">Jus</span>]][[User talk:Jusdafax|<span style="color: #C1118C;">da</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Jusdafax|<span style="color: #0000FF;">fax</span>]] : Jusdafax

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

I wasnt aware of the sandbox. Thanks for letting me know — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketchhup (talk • contribs) 00:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Hello Jusdafax: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 16:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas Jusdafax!!


Hi Jusdafax, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,
   –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Beth Ashley

Hi, I'm Abishe. Jusdafax, thanks for creating Beth Ashley!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Hello Jusdafax: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Archive 5←Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jusdafax/Archive_12&oldid=1083245309"