Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Frost were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WeTicket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Jurianus!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Frost14:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Frost,
Thanks a lot for checking my edit! I am learning how to use wikipedia and thought the sources were okay (given that they are all trustworthy and the cases of telegraaf en quote quite renowned journalistic media companies.
Could you specify on which of the 4 bases the sources were considered unreliable? Keen to learn and improve!
I see, fully agree with you on the first source, and thanks for the additional information. But just so i understand you correctly, a news article that says something was founded by someone is not a significant source supporting that fact? And neither is an article on an investment a good source supporting a statement about that very investment? Jurianus (talk) 14:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable sources that are not significant can be used to support individual statements, as long as the content added accurately matches the source. The importance of significant coverage here is to establish notability for the subject to comply with Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Frost16:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WeTicket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
