User talk:Juraj Budak

Welcome!

Hello, Juraj Budak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Justice007 (talk) 21:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My Greeting

Za pivo i prasetinu uvijek spreman!

Please comment on Talk:Joseph Grimaldi

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Joseph Grimaldi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cohen

G'day Juraj Budak. Consequent to your comments about the subject book on Talk:Ante Pavelić I invite you to participate in the discussion of whether Philip Cohen's book 'Serbia's Secret War: propaganda and the deceit of history' is a WP:RS on Yugoslavia in WW2 in general at the reliable sources noticeboard here. Regards, Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I believe you are right. Regards, Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Muhammad Iqbal

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Muhammad Iqbal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Mila Kunis

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mila Kunis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Ante Pavelić

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ante Pavelić. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:History of liberalism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:History of liberalism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of my attempts to include Aristotle and the Stoics as forerunners of liberal thought? Thanks. LiamFitzGilbert (talk) 07:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Kumar Parakala

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kumar Parakala. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of copyvio link tag from Ustase

Please do not remove the ^{[infringing link?]} template from articles as you did at Ustase. For legal reasons, WP cannot accept links to copyrighted text on other websites; such links will be checked by WP editors experienced in the area of copyright violations and will be deleted, and removing the template will not help your case. If you continue to remove ^{[infringing link?]} templates, you may be blocked from editing. Regards, Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:27, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Daniyal Mueenuddin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Daniyal Mueenuddin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Richard Tylman

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Richard Tylman. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:David Copperfield (illusionist)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:David Copperfield (illusionist). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of responses on Ante Pavelic talk page

I note that you have removed all my responses to your concerns listed on the subject talk page. I asked for permission to do so, waited two weeks but received no response then responded on a line by line basis to your concerns. Your removal of all of my comments when I did not change any of your comments at all, and reference to my comments as vandalism is very poor wikibehaviour. I will not bother responding to your comments in future as you appear not to be interested in any opinion or view other than your own. Good day. Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your second act of incivilty. Next time I am goring to report such behavior as an incident and request administrative action against you!--Juraj Budak (talk) 00:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Looking forward to seeing that WP:BOOMERANG. Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Alben W. Barkley

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alben W. Barkley. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Frank L. VanderSloot

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frank L. VanderSloot. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Juraj Budak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is going on? A joke?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Juraj Budak (talk) 13:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Juraj Budak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, this is my first account I ever used and opened. Then which way I was able to use multiple accounts and where it is visible, and what is the evidence? When I did it and how? Why I should defend myself and how I could defend myself if no evidence of my misconduct was ever provided? I do not see which way I did do any damage to Wikipedia within the existence of my account. I had only good intentions and had a number of serious discussions and contributions, all in line of the valid Wikipedia policy. Reviewing the list of blocked IP addresses assigned to incriminated name, I discovered that the same "name" lived on many places across the US and Canada, then even in Europe! It looks to me that neo-Ustase have their Wikipedia article writers and Wikipedia administrators shielding them regularly. Shame on Wikipedia! --Juraj Budak (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I was about to contact the blocking admin for their input, until the statement "It looks to me that neo-Ustase have their Wikipedia article writers and Wikipedia administrators shielding them regularly". You really should have read WP:GAB and considered that if this indeed had been an erroneous block, statements like that prove a WP:BATTLE mentality that is not (not shall it ever be) welcome on Wikipedia (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.