User talk:Juniperpaul

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Juniperpaul. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Technopat (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicola-Griffith-Hild-cover-Blackfriars-by-Balbusso.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicola-Griffith-Hild-cover-Blackfriars-by-Balbusso.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Stefan. I uploaded the Hild book cover image for this page: Draft:Hild (novel) which I am currently readying for publication review. I tried to indicate this in the 'Article' parameter of the fair use infobox for image: File:Nicola-Griffith-Hild-cover-Blackfriars-by-Balbusso.png

This is my first time creating a new page and uploading an image to Wikipedia. I'm very unsure of myself, swimming in unfamiliar documentation, so I really appreciate your advice and criticism. Please let me know if I'm doing things in the wrong order, using the wrong templates, or filling out the parameters incorrectly. Was I supposed to have waited until the Hild page was published before uploading its image? Cheers, Paul. Juniperpaul (talk) 23:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple infobox book publishers?

Is it possible to list more than one publisher to a book infobox? For Hild by Nicola Griffith I specified Farrar, Straus and Giroux, the US publisher of the first hardcover edition, but also significant is Blackfriars Books who published the first UK hardcover edition (after the US edition had come out). The cover image I've uploaded for this page is the cover of the UK edition, not the US one. I haven't found reference or examples of multiple infobox publishers in the WP documentation yet. Thanks! Juniperpaul (talk) 21:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question answered via Kiwi IRC Help: The infobox book publisher field value can contain multiple items separated by <br> tags. Juniperpaul (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hild (novel) (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 19:06, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Juniperpaul, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 19:06, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Josve05a. I've seen examples of novel pages quoting publisher's blurbs so I thought it was OK if I did so and referenced it correctly. I'll write the novel summary myself and then re-submit the draft. Juniperpaul (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hild (novel) has been accepted

Hild (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did have to edit the article somewhat extensively. Overall it was good, but there were a few things to point out. The biggie was that a lot of the article sort of came across as original research on your part. I do see where you were trying to get what the author was saying, but in doing so you did put in some of your own research. This might not have been so bad except that it also sort of came across as a little fannish in tone. I don't think that this was intentional, but it did come across as overly praising. I also had to remove some of the links that weren't mentioning the book per se (they were about the historical person) since they were slightly redundant to the link to the Wikipedia article adn I also removed some links that were in places that weren't really reliable. The Historical Novels site was sort of a blog/SPS type of site so I removed that and the HuffPo review/list was from one of their blogs, which has the same type of issue. The Historical Novel Society was a bit troublesome since I didn't know if Griffith was a member, which would make it a WP:PRIMARY source. You've got to be careful with those, so it's usually better to err on the side of caution and not include them. It didn't diminish the work's notability any and it's still notable without it, so I removed it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Tokyogirl79. I'll study your changes to improve my aim on future contributions. Juniperpaul (talk) 06:22, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicola-Griffith-Hild-cover-Blackfriars-by-Balbusso.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicola-Griffith-Hild-cover-Blackfriars-by-Balbusso.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Stefan. This image was reawakened not by me but by Tokyogirl79. I would have deleted the image but I couldn't see a mechanism for doing so.

I've replaced that cover image with another one, now tied to the published page Hild_(novel).

Please let me know if you see any errors in my posting. Juniperpaul (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll speedy it as a redundant image and as a user request (WP:G7). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Juniperpaul. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Solitaire-by-Kelley-Eskridge-pub-Small-Beer-Press-cover-by-Frances-Lassor.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Solitaire-by-Kelley-Eskridge-pub-Small-Beer-Press-cover-by-Frances-Lassor.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Draft:OtherLife

Please don't add copyright content to this wiki, not even temporarily for editing, not even in drafts or sandboxes. Please do your amendments before you save the page, or use an external editor. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Diannaa. I hadn't realized the prohibitions on copyrighted material applied to drafts. I've also removed the copyrighted plot summary from my Draft:Solitaire (novel draft which I'd similarly popped in as a placeholder pending my own rewrite. Juniperpaul (talk) 17:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You can help us make Wikipedia better

Wikipedia has many articles in need of improvement. Perhaps you can help.

Some articles need copy editing.

Category:All articles needing copy edit

Wikipedia articles need verifiable information from WP:reliable sources

Category:Articles lacking sources

Reliable sources should have inline citations to identify where information came from

Category:Articles lacking in-text citations

We would appreciate help in improving these articles.

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community_portal Cheers, and happy editing. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Solitaire-by-Kelley-Eskridge-pub-Small-Beer-Press-cover-by-Frances-Lassor.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Solitaire-by-Kelley-Eskridge-pub-Small-Beer-Press-cover-by-Frances-Lassor.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Juniperpaul. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solitaire (novel) has been accepted

Solitaire (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jprg1966 ^(talk) 01:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:OtherLife concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:OtherLife, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:OtherLife

Hello, Juniperpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OtherLife".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Juniperpaul. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eileen Gunn bibliography concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eileen Gunn bibliography, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eileen Gunn bibliography concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eileen Gunn bibliography, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:48, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eileen Gunn bibliography

Hello, Juniperpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eileen Gunn bibliography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elephant Mountain Literary Festival

Hello, Juniperpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elephant Mountain Literary Festival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eileen Gunn bibliography

Hello, Juniperpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eileen Gunn bibliography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elephant Mountain Literary Festival

Hello, Juniperpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elephant Mountain Literary Festival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John D. Berry

Hello, Juniperpaul. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John D. Berry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John D. Berry

Hello, Juniperpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John D. Berry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eileen Gunn bibliography

Hello, Juniperpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eileen Gunn bibliography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elephant Mountain Literary Festival

Hello, Juniperpaul. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elephant Mountain Literary Festival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]