User talk:Juniperi

August 2017

Hello, I'm Kaldari. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Abstract photography have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kaldari (talk) 21:35, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DIPO DIGITAL POSTCARD®

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DIPO DIGITAL POSTCARD®, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lapablo (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Juniperi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DIPO Digital Postcards

I myself have always attached great importance to my scientific work, also during my activities in the university area, and only worked with appropriate evidence. And never also or especially here in Wikipedia against these rules on Wikipedia. on the contrary, I have documented everything and can prove everything. But as a scientist, I don't want the rules to come first, to point you in a corner to a playground. Just because you, as experienced Wikipedia augurs, are doing a great job, you shouldn't let yourself be guided within such a short period of time just because a product name could be annoying without really gaining extensive background knowledge. If certain processes seem unrealistic at first, but the background has only been covered up until now, the research should go deeper than just clicking on Delete. Juniperi (talk) 16:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I don't understand what you are trying to say. We're just administering the guidelines and ensuring that every editor has the same opportunity to create articles and abides by the same restrictions as every other editor. Deb (talk) 19:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Share knowledge to contribute to learning

Hello, I am Veronica, it is a great pleasure to know through Josef Heinz Neumann about Digital Postcards if we manage to have a minimum of objectivity we know that in none of his writings Mr. Josef Heinz Neuman uses "promotional" I am neutral and I think that wikipedia is a means to express knowledge and in this case Mr. Josef Heinz Neumann in all his writings only reflects the desire to share his knowledge with the sole objective of contributing to learning Verolopez10 (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]