User talk:Juniorpetjua

Welcome

Hello Juniorpetjua, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Juniorpetjua, good luck, and have fun. --CMD (talk) 18:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As an additional note, it will help everyone if you communicate in English on this site. If you need to ask something and your English isn't that strong, perhaps ask at a wikiproject where people are likely to understand, such as Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brazil. Hope this helps, CMD (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of largest cities in Brazil

Re the reversions you made at this article, you shouldn't just straight-revert without explanations. You will note I gave edit summaries in my edits. I'd be grateful if you could explain your edits or else self-revert some of your changes. Eldumpo (talk) 21:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of largest cities in Brazil shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Giant Snowman 08:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not just keep reverting edits without discussion. Please comment here or at article talk. The urban agglomerations are not sourced from the link you are adding, which is better for the cities section, whereas the source you're using for that is not in a list format. Eldumpo (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paulo Ribenboim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images on Empire of Brazil

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Empire of Brazil. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please see the article's talk page • Astynax ^talk 18:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Empire of Brazil. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please see the article's talk page. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lecen (talk) 10:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Juniorpetjua, you may want that image in the article but you need to discuss why on the talk page. Other editors have reverted you and you must now discuss this, not edit war. A discussion has already been opened. Keep reverting, even once more, and you will be blocked. You have been warned before for edit warring, which should have been enough to change your behaviour - please heed the warning this time. Fences&Windows 19:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uilson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retirada de texto

Fica lá na Wiki-PT com aquele bando de mal educados que gosta de se meter nas edições dos outros, sem respeitá-las. Aqui não. Se ficar retirando minhas edições só porque está com vontade, baseado em nada, eu vou procurar a administração daqui, que não é uma panelinha viciada que nem na Wiki-PT, e você leva block na hora. Recoloquei meu texto com fonte, e nem pense em retirá-lo de novo. Lembrando a você que eu nem precisaria colocar fonte, já que o início dos artigos é um resumo, onde a fonte é desnecessária. Se você quer retirar um texto, tem que explicar o porquê e tem que ser um motivo razoável, o que não houve neste caso, de jeito nenhum. 177.142.59.113 (talk) 10:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This is not the first time you push photos on the article about the Empire of Brazil, causing an edit war. Stop that. There are plenty of articles that need improvement. Try to work on them. --Lecen (talk) 02:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Calidum ¤ 03:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Juniorpetjua reported by User:Calidum (Result: ). Thank you. Calidum ¤ 03:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Empire of Brazil

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Empire of Brazil in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 15:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Empire of Brazil

You've already been warned about this article. The next time you revert, unless you have a prior talk page consensus in your favor, you are likely to be blocked. If you can't reach agreement with other editors, the steps of WP:dispute resolution are open to you. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Juniorpetjua. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Brazilian history

Muito obrigado pelos seus comentários, o ataque em Santos de fato não foi em 1595, foi em algum ponto entre 1588 e 1591. Vou adicionar os eventos que você sugeriu. Ainda tem vários outros eventos que poderiam ser adicionados. PMLF (talk) 19:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cambalachero. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Cambalachero (talk) 17:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva

Please stop edit-warring at Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. For example, we prefer to say that someone "stated" something rather than "claimed" something, as it is a more neutral form of language. And please don't reintroduce trivia of little or no relevance to an already long article. Edwardx (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

It would be very helpful to other editors if you used an edit summary. "It is good practice to fill in the edit summary field, as this helps others to understand the intention of your edit." - see Help:Edit summary. Thank you! Edwardx (talk) 00:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 01:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Juniorpetjua. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Juniorpetjua. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Message

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Stockpeixe (talk) 22:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm City of Silver. I noticed that you recently removed content from Recife without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. City of Silver 00:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paraíba bucéfalo

Escuta, paraíba bucéfalo çoçialistinha de buteco, vai comer sua buxada de bode estragada e pegar seu bolsa-família no inferno, dejeto comedor de buesta ideológika de mhérdia. Gente como você só serve pra afundar o BR no lixo. Vyadinhu LGTV drogadin que fica perambulando na rua tentando lalar coisa de turista. 2804:214:859E:6351:B8E8:8187:273E:D11A (talk) 14:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]