User talk:Jungleed

ITN recognition for Umang Gupta

On 26 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Umang Gupta, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 07:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vetster moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vetster, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello Jungleed. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jungleed. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jungleed|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I am not a paid editor. Please can you remove the tag that you placed?? I cannot believe that I can be accused of such thing without any evidence. Jungleed (talk) 20:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vetster moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vetster, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. Could you be a little more specific of the issues? Per guidelines if there is significant news from reliable publications it will qualify. There are several such articles such as:

https://todaysveterinarybusiness.com/vetster-matches-pet-owners-with-veterinary-advisers/

https://inbusinessphx.com/growth-enterprise/on-demand-virtual-veterinary-appointments#.YtNvhHJlCUk

https://thelogic.co/news/telehealth-for-rover-vetsters-growth-fuelled-by-pandemics-telehealth-pet-care-boom/

https://www.androidheadlines.com/2021/09/vetster-android-app-pets-dogs.html

https://www.petbusiness.com/industry-news/vetster-launches-online-pet-pharmacy/article_45983fa4-05be-11ec-a256-2b111aed704c.html

Just some of the articles.

In addition, another editor tagged the page with a paid editor verbiage. But I am not a paid editor. I am simply a customer of this company and that is how I know about them. I do not have any COI. I have no clue why he thinks I am a paid editor and why someone would do that randomly. Makes no sense to accuse someone without any evidence. Could we please remove that tag? Jungleed (talk) 02:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jungleed. You're welcome. If you are confident that the sources in the article show that Wikpedia's notability requirements are met, then the are welcome to hit "Submit" so that an independent reviewer can check it. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canadian companies established in 2020

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian companies established in 2020 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vetster (company) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vetster (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 13:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You reviewed and approved the page on May 19th, so what has changed???

Also, why do you keep tagging it that it was created by a paid editor??? I made the page and I am not a paid editor. I do not have COI. I have used their service before and felt they should have page. In addition, the reason I post it again is because they have additional news now and plenty to meet notability.

I have checked the policies at WP:Conflict of Interest

"Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships. Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest. That someone has a conflict of interest is a description of a situation, not a judgement about that person's opinions, integrity, or good faith."

You need to have evidence before you accuse people. You are to assume good faith. Please check Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Jungleed (talk) 18:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vetster (company)

Hello, Jungleed. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vetster (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vetster (company)

Hello, Jungleed. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vetster".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]