Hi JungleJoe, The links are all Chinese language references so I don't think they are appropriate for the English Wikipedia. Also, while I personally like original research, Wikipedia is supposed to have already existing knowledge (published in other places) rather than original work. I agree with you that the number of references is overkill. Personally I would simply remove the Chinese language references because this is an English language Wikipedia and it is very difficult for non-Chinese speakers to be able to evaluate the quality of the information and reference site. On the other hand we do have translate.google.com to see if the text actually matches the source. I am suspicious that this is some kind of blackhat SEO to get rankings, but that may not be accurate at all. Cheers and thanks for the smile :D --Jeffmcneill (talk) 01:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Joe. Made edits to our discussion on the talk page. Hopefully I haven't mangled things too badly. Please correct anything I have neglected or made a mistake on. --Jeffmcneill (talk) 01:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would like to see your thoughts on this discussion. I think we both got busy with other things. Would like to take the next step on improving this page soon. Let me know. Cheers, --Jeffmcneill (talk) 01:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
