User talk:June24th

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Danh108 (talk) 16:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. v/r - T P 20:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

June24th (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no other Wikipedia accounts. I have never even edited the Wikipedia before. This is a complete false accusation made by BKWSU followers who are trying to control the page. I believe publishing a true version of the version the Brahma Kumaris fabricates is worth to be blocked. I urge the WIKIPEDIA administrators to completely remove brahma Kumaris from this data base till they get their act together. Wikkipedia is to be a reliable source and when people are blocked for getting the reliable done and than be blocked than Wikkipedia can not be considered a reliable sours anymore. The Brahma kumaris version is full of broken references and exaggerations which is false information and misleading. .June24th (talk) 16:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below (How's that for a response to something in the TL;DR category?) — Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is suspicious is that, three days after January was blocked, you show up with a similar username style, with a similar story behind it, and behave as January did sans the outing. We weren't born yesterday. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]