User talk:Junaidramzan

January 2012

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Junaidramzan. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Qnet, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Qnet, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:23, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 22:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk you are not making any kind of sense and wondering how you have been honored as top contributor for wiki. ironic!!!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Junaidramzan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the information mentioned in the page should either be complete and should give a picture to the reader and should remain unbiased. A typical MLM binary tree structure with not any further information misleads any reader to assume Qnet to be classified as an insignificant MLM Scam. The current version says "Qnet's business model has been described as a simple pyramid scheme, where initial entrants to the scheme do make money, but as the number of Independent Representatives(IR) increases, finding more IR's becomes harder and harder, until those that join late are unable to recover even their initial outlay and the model collapses." PLEASE WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE DEAR. PYRAMIDS exists only in Egypt today. Pyramid schemes are BANNED across the globe. To have knowledge and to be informed is powerful skill, but to think you know is pure Arrogance...

 Junaidramzan (talk) 22:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Editing Qnet wikipage

Hi, I request you to kindly communicate the reason why you are changing the content on the site.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Junaidramzan (talk • contribs) — Junaidramzan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to articles, categories, templates, talk page discussions, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for... Advertising. All information about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree to the statement that the topics must be verifiable with independent 3rd party source... so please verify and explain to us what information is biased as mentioned...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Junaidramzan (talk • contribs) — Junaidramzan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The amount of actual information was totally overwhelmed by the flood of advertising spew. Language like ""fastest-growing online shopping and business community"" (it's a company, not a community); "millions of successful distributors"; "packed with exclusive lifestyle brands for a healthy, happy life"; "to enrich the lives of customers through its innovative products its business opportunity to work for themselves and even give back to the community"; "constantly evolving group has also expanded organically into various new segments through strategic investments"; "encompasses all aspects of business, using the internet as its modality bringing products and services from all points of the globe to the customer wherever he or she may be"; and "expansion into high-quality interrelated businesses, products and services has created many new opportunities for their customers"! This is not how normal human beings write, this is how copywriters spin a giant MLM plan, as if it were somehow a public service! --Orange Mike | Talk 22:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]