User talk:Julio91red
Julio91red, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Julio91red! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC) |
Julio91red (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, my account has been blocked without warning, and in an abusive manner by the user User:Oshwah. I propose to see the changes on the Southern Europe page that caused this abuse of power by this user. Of users frequently override their rights and this has to stop. I therefore request the immediate unblocking of my account. Julio91red (talk) 09:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 10:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- What are you talking about ? You just support your comrade's decision without any thought.Julio91red (talk) 16:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- If you have evidence that I declined your request without thought, please supply it, otherwise please stop making baseless claims. You were blocked for sockpuppetry, yet you did not deal with this in your request, either to acknowledge or refute it. Instead you just made a personal attack on another sdministrator, which is why I declined your request. You are welcome to make another request, but it must deal with the reasons for your block, and not on other users. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 17:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Julio91red (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello I have just learned that my account has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Except it is indeed my account. Even if it's just an excuse used by a user. Julio91red (talk) 19:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Pretty impressive to claim with a straight face that you are unrelated to Julio189red. I mean, obviously, it hasn't worked out for you, but nice try. Yamla (talk) 21:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Yamla But my Julio189Red account was blocked, I did another one several months later, and you re-blocked me for sockpuppetry. What should I do ??? Create yet another if you block them all for no reason? good try ?? and no you just have to think 1 min before answering. Either you unblock my Julio189red account or you unblock the one. This account is not a sockpuppetry.--Julio91red (talk) 11:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- You seem to fundamentally misunderstand WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. What you describe is indeed sockpuppetry. If you create yet another account, we'll block that one, too, and you may end up banned, not just blocked. And please, stop being so rude. --Yamla (talk) 14:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)