User talk:Juliepersonne2

This is Juliepersonne2's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jinny's Kitchen (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Close but not quite enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jinny's Kitchen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Juliepersonne2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jinny's Kitchen

Hello, Juliepersonne2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jinny's Kitchen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jinny's Kitchen has been accepted

Jinny's Kitchen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 18:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some guidance on your Jinny's Kitchen page

Hi! Here's some stuff regarding the edits I made to Jinny's Kitchen, a page that you made. It's a nice article, but I feel like there are some things you need to know. I'll try to explain why I made the changes I did, because a small edit summary definitely wouldn't fit all of this!

First off, you should place your references like this, after the period.^[1] Don't place them like this, before the period^[1]. (The relevant guideline is MOS:CITEPUNCT—these pages that start with WP link to Wikipedia guidelines or essays, and links beginning with MOS go to pages in the Wikipedia Manual of Style.) Also keep the formatting of the cast members' names consistent—Kim Tae-hyung's has the syllables in his name spaced apart, while Choi Woo-shik's is smushed together and Lee Seo-jin's name is separated by a hyphen. I unified all of these to hyphens because it just looks better.

The changes in the list of episodes were 1. to correct grammar and make wording more natural and 2. to remove editorializing. Since I haven't watched the show, I don't know if my changes made the summaries less accurate to its content, but compare the sentences "The tasks keep piling up on interns Tae Hyung and Wooshik on whom fatigue is really starting to take its toll" and "The interns Tae-hyung and Woo-shik's tasks continue, and they start to feel tired". The dramatic (sorry, couldn't find a better word) language in the first sentence seems much less fit to Wikipedia's sterile, neutral writing style. The pages WP:EMPHATIC and MOS:WTW explain this well.

I removed the mention in the lead of the Friday timeslot because, as MOS:TV states, "Days or timeslots are not inherently notable, but if covering a series that switches these during its run, it may be helpful to note them for each season."

Lastly, this page made by a Wikipedia user has some really nice resources on copyediting, the art of making one's writing less clunky and easier to understand. If you aim to be a Wikipedia contributor, you'll need to get used to writing well so that editors like me don't have to clean up the tracks. The Manual of Style is also a must-read for new contributors. I see you're a rather new editor, so I'm giving you some advice as someone who knows the ropes. Wuju Daisuki (talk) 01:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) Thank you for all these informations. Being new on Wikipedia, it's hard to know which help pages or manual to read first and reading it all at once would simply be discouraging to the point of giving up^^. For example, about the period, I used your version thinking it was just your preference and I was ready to not take it into account elsewhere. So thank you

About "The changes in the list of episodes", I completely understand that's why I took the time to re-add what you did while solving the conflict of edit. I do see how it is better on most of those related edits. Adding "The tasks keep piling up on interns Tae Hyung and Wooshik on whom fatigue is really starting to take its toll" was actually my attempt to follow your edits, the original sentence being "The interns Tae Hyung and Wooshik keeps on having more tasks and starts to really feel tired". I thought you were looking for a more natural way to say it. Didn't think of the dramatic aspect of it. I don't mind searching for other ways to write it but I don't want to change the meaning as it is still a summary of a situation. I want to show that there is more tasks and not only that they keep on doing their job. I know it can seem minor but I mind. Would "While the amount of tasks of interns Tae Hyung and Wooshik keeps increasing, they start to feel very tired" fit better?

For "Fridays", I'm sorry I hadn't noticed you'd removed it. It's not like it's an important information in this paragraph.

I'll take a look thank you! Juliepersonne2 (talk) 02:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]