User talk:Juliedobkin/sandbox

Peer Review of Project 2 Draft

Hi Julie, your topic is a really interesting one, and judging from the original article, there seems to be a lot of extra information that simply fill the space without giving interesting content. As such, your decision to edit the article is a sound one, albeit somewhat daunting considering how much additional content you'll need to add. Overall, you manage to abide by the requirements that Wikipedia has for its articles, providing a non-biased view that shares information from good sources. The sections that you do contribute to ("Propagation" and "Uses") show your knowledge in the subject. My major concern that you may need to improve on is a matter of meeting the word limit that this assignment has. Maryamattar (talk) 06:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Julie, I thought that your rough draft was well done and made the article more concise and understandable. There are clear sections of the article that have been reorganized, which adds to the value of it. If I was to recommend anything, I would recommend linking propagation to a page or explaining what it is. For someone without a specific scientific background, this term would be hard to understand, otherwise, it is a well written! Patel.nikita17 (talk) 20:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]