User talk:Juliandroms

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Juliandroms, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --TeaDrinker 19:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nice edits

to male contraceptives. you did a good job of cleaning it up/adding clarity. Cindery 21:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AGF

I've been giving you a hard time, and shamefully enjoying it a little bit. But, I do actually believe my main position strongly, and would hold it regardless of the names. Part of what has annoyed me is that, from the start, you have assumed that I was not operating in good faith. And, I have risen to that expectation somewhat in response. I don't, however, concede the article belongs or that some of the Napolatino criticism doesn't. I am not out for a whitewash, and I have done _plenty_ of neutralizing on all sides in articles, regardless of my personal sympathies.

I realize that you are operating in good faith. I really do have no objection to integrating his comments, and criticisms of them, into Wikipedia in the _relevant_ place. But, I strongly object to setting a precedent of hashing out the same old stuff all over Wikipedia every time a subject is mentioned. That's a lesson I've learned from long experience. I know you disagree; I doubt this will be resolved to everyone's satisfaction. But, I see from the above comment that you've made some positive contributions, and I don't want this dispute to run you off in disgust. I think you'll find that people actually do try to be fair; there are plenty of opinionated folks who rolled in here with guns blazing who now get along with just about everyone. Derex 08:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paternity (biology and medicine) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paternity (biology and medicine). Since you had some involvement with the Paternity (biology and medicine) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]