User talk:Juliancaza

Welcome!

Hello, Juliancaza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
How to edit a page and write a great article
The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
The handy Manual of Style
And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

–Sango 123 (e) 16:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

License tagging for Image:Pinegrovefront.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Pinegrovefront.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of NUFN

NUFN, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that NUFN satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NUFN and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of NUFN during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Mike Vitale 16:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of No Use For Nickels

Repost of No Use For Nickels

A tag has been placed on No Use For Nickels, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how No Use For Nickels is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:No Use For Nickels saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 00:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for New, Fresh, but Safe Day

New, Fresh, but Safe Day has been nominated for deletion. Check it out.

Notability

Just existing isn't sufficient to merit a page on Wikipedia. Check out the criteria at WP:ORG for an idea of what is required. If you have any questions, please let me know. -Chunky Rice (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm afraid that any source that can be edited by anyone (blogs, wikis, social networking sites, etc.) does not qualify as a reliable source and can not be used to show notability. -Chunky Rice (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:No_Use_For_Nickels_Logo.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:No_Use_For_Nickels_Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]