User talk:Julian Herzog

Welcome!

Hello, Julian Herzog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Talk:Blender (software). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tito Dutta ✉ 16:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Hi-Rez Curiosity Rover images

Hello Julian Herzog - Seems there's two "high-resolution" images of the Curiosity Rover on Wikipedia: image-1 and image-2 - Question (since you may know the answer and I'm still learning): both images seem to be JPG; both seem to be from the same source; both seem to have the same noted resolution (ie -> 5,463 × 7,595 pixels) - but the one I uploaded earlier has the same image-size as noted by the source at "3.65 mb"; whereas your image-size is much larger, at "19.48 mb" instead? - would you happen to know why this might be? - just curious - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 21:19, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry for the confusion. The image I uploaded has the same resolution, but it is rendered by me from the original, uncompressed Tiff-File that NASA published, with some grading that gives it a slightly higher contrast (if you compare them side by side, you will notice). That gives my version both a higher image quality due to less compression and it looks slightly better (in my opinion) as - while the low contrast of NASA's rendering might be scientifically accurate - we are used to higher contrast in images and it shows the colours and details more clearly. It also increases the size of the file, but for the downsized versions in articles, that doesn't matter. I think both versions have their right to exist, a choice should be made for every use individually.

I hope that explains it. --Julian H. (talk) 21:56, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you *very* much for your explanation - it's *greatly* appreciated - I tried the images side-by-side as suggested and yes, I entirely agree, your image looks better - interesting - Thanks again for your explanation - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad I could clarify this, and thanks to you for the amazing work on the articles related to MSL. To further improve the image, I corrected some of its distortion now, too. --Julian H. (talk) 10:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your latest efforts on removing some of the image distortion - and for updating the image on the various related articles - the image looks Excellent imo - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 13:46, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Curiosity (rover)

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:PIA16239 High-Resolution Self-Portrait by Curiosity Rover Arm Camera.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:46, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lindau Harbor entrance

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Lindau Harbor Lake Constance MS Schwaben 01.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:33, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution - Eurofighter Maximum Speed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurofighter_Typhoon - McSly is edit warring this. At present the speed of Mach 2.35 is based on '2495kph at 10,975m' and a simple calculation agreed with yourself and Bushranger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eurofighter_Typhoon#Typhoon_max_speed. The German wiki has reached the same consensus independently ('3O') https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurofighter_Typhoon. Please could you protect the page assuming you have the power.Z07x10 (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would, but I don't have the rights, sorry. I'm no expert in this, but you might have better chances here: WP:RFP. — Julian H.^✈(talk) 20:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A case has now been raised at DRN - Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Eurofighter_Typhoon.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Julian, Howicus is asking about evidence of your e-mail response from Eurofighter.com on the dispute page. A screen dump image or something should be sufficient.Z07x10 (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened an arbitration.Z07x10 (talk) 23:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is currently an RFC on the Eurofighter talk page, feel free to offer your input.Z07x10 (talk) 13:59, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Eurofighter Typhoon". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 09:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Case request

The arbitration request involving you has been declined. The comments left at the request may be helpful for proceeding further. For the Arbitration Committee, Rs chen 7754 19:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Eurofighter Typhoon". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 November 2013.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 12:09, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Eurofighter Typhoon, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, Sunray (talk) 03:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

POTD notification

Hi Julian,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Lindau Harbor Lake Constance MS Schwaben 01.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 27, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-01-27. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, really nice to know in advance (and great to have the image honoured). :) — Julian H.^✈(talk) 18:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Christiansborg Slot Copenhagen 2014 01.jpg

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Christiansborg Slot Copenhagen 2014 01.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/USS Essex (CV-9) - January 1960

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:USS Essex (CVA-9) underway in heavy seas, 12 January 1960 (NH 98517).jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Emirates Airbus A380-861 A6-EER MUC 2015 04.jpg

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Emirates Airbus A380-861 A6-EER MUC 2015 04.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:04, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eurofighter RCS

Hi Julian, I'm currently in a dispute regarding paragraph two in this content:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurofighter_Typhoon#Radar_signature_reduction_features. The other side has lost an accusation of synthesis, however they're now making an argument about source reliability. IPCS.org and globalsecurity.org are already used hundreds of times in wikipedia and have good credentials:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=globalsecurity.org&go=Go

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=ipcs.org&go=Go

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/overview/praise.htm

http://www.ipcs.org/about-us/

Then they make a case about 'not liking the comparative language, which has nothing to do with wiki policy. I'm getting the usual cliche mentality with Mztourist&family simply because he doesn't like the edit, could you and as many people as you can source help me make the case here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Eurofighter_Typhoon#Issues_to_be_mediated Z07x10 (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you ignore this blatant attempt at canvassing, and make your own mind up as to whether the consensus of multiple contributors (including people not previously involved in the dispute, such as myself) indicates a 'cliche mentality' (whatever that is supposed to mean), or a legitimate interpretation of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A) My name is Julian. B) I've made a conscious decision not to get involved. Thanks. — Julian H.^✈(talk) 18:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problems.Z07x10 (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Eurofighter Typhoon 2". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 22 June 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by TransporterMan (TALK), Committee Chairperson, on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 20:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Eurofighter Typhoon 2, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Eurofighter Typhoon 2, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aviat Eagle II 2

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Christen Eagle II N49AE EDST.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:42, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D-AIQT

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D-AIQT 01.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pilatus P3-03

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Pilatus P3-03 P3-Flyers HB-RBP OTT 2013 02.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're a champ. Have one of these!

	Calatrava Medal of Merit
	Thank very very much for your new picture for the infobox template on New Castle (Stuttgart). Vami IV (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You already got a medal from me, but here's a Barnstar I made

This barnstar is awarded to Julian Herzog for his contributions to Operation Stuttgart. Thanks to your photos, (Wikipedia) Stuttgart is a much prettier (and illustrated) place.

Thank you Vami IV, that's very nice to hear. I'll try to keep the photos coming! — Julian H.^✈(talk) 02:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Julian Herzog. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Julian,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D-AIQT 01.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on February 22, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-02-22. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Julian Herzog. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Julian Herzog. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Schloss Favorite, Ludwigsburg

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Schloss Favorite Ludwigsburg 2017 01.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/LET L-410NG OK-NGA ILA Berlin 2016 09.jpg

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:LET L-410NG OK-NGA ILA Berlin 2016 09.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hi Julian Herzog,

This is to let you know that File:LET L-410NG OK-NGA ILA Berlin 2016 09.jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 7, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-12-07. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let Kunovice, operating as Let, n.p., is a Czech (before December 1993 Czechoslovak) civil aircraft manufacturer. Its most successful design has been the L-410 Turbolet, of which more than 1300 units have been built (an upgraded version, the L-410 NG, is pictured here). Its head office is in Kunovice, Uherské Hradiště District. Let was owned by the Russian company UGMK from 2008 to 2022, when it was acquired by Czech-based Omnipol Group.

Photograph credit: Julian Herzog

Recently featured:

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hi Julian Herzog,

This is to let you know that File:Schloss Favorite Ludwigsburg 2017 01.jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 1, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-01-01. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600^th FP!} 04:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schloss Favorite is a maison de plaisance and hunting lodge built in the Baroque style in Ludwigsburg, Germany. It is located on a rise, directly north of Ludwigsburg Palace and connected via an avenue to it. This panorama of Schloss Favorite, taken in January 2017, was stitched from eight separate photographs captured from the avenue linking it to the palace. The building is shown in a snow-covered clearing in the woods, framed by bare trees lining the avenue.

Photograph credit: Julian Herzog

Recently featured: