User talk:Jules~enwiki

AfD Nomination: Chez Jules

An editor has nominated the article Chez Jules for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chez Jules. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Chez Jules during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 17:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And It's Arsenal Afd

You recently !voted in this Afd. I've just seen one of the other prods was contested, for We all follow the Arsenal and have included it in the Afd and would welcome further comment. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 21:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Sickles High School

Another editor has listed an article that you have been involved in editing, Sickles High School, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sickles High School. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Eastmain 14:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted

You here, not sure what you were trying to do but you cut my signature into two and your "comment" had nothing to do with the AFD. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 17:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Jules, just saying thanks for fixing my error on Utongmar's talk page! -SpuriousQ (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

gay news

thanks for taking the time to leave a note...it's rarely done, and i admit i should do it more often. whereas i, too, resist patronizing, but considering the wide range of readership, the notation “gb£” is really not that common...particularly in america where “usd” might not even be familiar.--emerson7 | Talk 16:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity

Please see the note on "Vanity" I have left in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Véronique Becker, so we can be *nice* to people. Tyrenius 03:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request for Usurpation of Username "Jules"

I should emphasize that my authority at WP:CHU/U is limited mainly to clerical tasks -- final decisions on usurping (or not) are made by the bureaucrats who watch the page. That said, I'm not aware of anything that seems to be a problem, with regards to your current request. – Luna Santin (talk) 19:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players

Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 17:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your POV, I've added a reply specifically to your entry, especially as i disagree! StephP 14:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vote!

Following your contribution to the discussion on football player notability you might be interested in voting on this. Rgds, StephP 10:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Jancevski

I would like to see your opinion, following your contributions on the talkpage of WP:BIO. If international player does not mean notability, then I am wondering why this article will be kept. User:KRBN 20:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jules. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jules~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:59, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

14:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]