User talk:Jugrajsingh77
Hi, This is my Talk Page. Please feel free to drop by and leave a message sometime. Jugrajsingh77 (talk) 05:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Welcome Jugrajsingh77!
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Jugraj Singh (author) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Jugraj Singh (author), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 15:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of [[]] for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jugraj Singh (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
CUPIDICAE💕 16:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Explain
[edit]You claim on your userpage that you are the "new Wikimedia intern". Would you care to explain what exactly you mean? CUPIDICAE💕 16:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Your response to this question on Praxidicae's page is completely unacceptable. You need to either reply with an explanation of what you mean by being "the new Wikimedia training intern at the university of edinburgh", or remove the statement from your userpage. If you do neither, you will be blocked from editing. Also, I would like to know what you mean by posting a template on your userpage where you ask other people to "remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite", while you yourself speak rudely, as you did on Praxidicae's page. Being civil doesn't qualify as one of the "intricacies" of Wikipedia; incivility isn't tolerated just because you're new. There is no need for you to come to my page to respond; please just reply below. Bishonen | tålk 17:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC).
you are nobody to ask me any questions! you are nothing Jugrajsingh77 (talk) 17:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Intern? Then please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Even if you are not being compensated with money, as is often the case with interns, you may be required to make these disclosures. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:Hunter_King_(actor).jpg was uploaded by you as "own work". This raises the question about your possibility of a conflict of interest. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
January 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)- If you continue when the block expires, you will be blocked indefinitely. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, and while blocked, please read WP:CIVIL. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jugrajsingh77, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.