User talk:Juemason
This article has been added to replace the entry for Expansive Media Ltd that was previously live.
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 19:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Media Promotions and Publishing for deletion
[edit]
The article Media Promotions and Publishing is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Promotions and Publishing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
"Is there a process of submitting the article to a more qualified and experienced administrator for consideration?" Yes. It is the AfC above discussion. The important point being that it is all editors who consider it, not just admins. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the message you left on my talk page. The reason that Media Promotions and Publishing is proposed for deletion is that it is suggested that the article does not meet our notability guidelines (which you can read by following that link). Articles must meet our notability guidelines to have a place on Wikipedia; otherwise there would be an article on every living person and every company ever created, and it would become extremely difficult to find the useful and relevant information on Wikipedia in amongst the chaff. Articles that do not meet our notability guidelines generally also have problems with being encyclopaedicly verifiable and presenting a neutral point of view.
To meet the notability guidelines, an article topic must have 'significant coverage in reliable independent sources. "Significant coverage" means a mention that is more than merely trivial - that is, the coverage must provide substantive facts that are capable of providing meaningful content for an encyclopaedic article. "Reliable" means that the source must have clear authorship and be subject to editorial control, and/or have a strong reputation of reliability. (Blogs are generally not reliable, newspapers generally are.) "Independent" means not affiliated with the topic of the article, and not having a vested interest in promoting the article topic. (Official websites are not independent. Neither are promotional materials, press releases, or storefronts.)
If you are able to demonstrate that Media Promotions and Publishing has received significant coverage in reliable independent sources (and show those sources by adding them to the article or linking them at the deletion debate) the article stands a good chance of being kept.
Hope this helps! - DustFormsWords (talk) 22:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)