User talk:Judit Szoleczky
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Andelssamfundet i Hjortshøj, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ecovillage.dk/93.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Iam living in AiH and it was me who made the English page http://www.ecovillage.dk/93.html. So there is no wonder that there is similarity. So there is no legal problem. I do not realy understand what I shall do. How can I write into the document that the system would understand this. I just started 2 days ago editing wikipedia. --Judit Szoleczky (talk) 13:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of INFORSE-Europe
[edit]
A tag has been placed on INFORSE-Europe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Thingg⊕⊗ 16:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
I added much more, I hope the system understand it and not deleting it. INFORSE-Europe is a major NGO network on European level.
--Judit Szoleczky (talk) 13:45, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
New sections on discussion pages go on the bottom
[edit]When you create new discussion sections on the talk pages, please place them at the bottom of the page instead of the top. NJGW (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Andelssamfundet i Hjortshøj
[edit]A tag has been placed on Andelssamfundet i Hjortshøj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 07:29, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- hoooo -- I noticed this late! I think it is very bad that you just deleted the entry !!!
I would like that it would be reestablished as well as being excepted that ecovillages can apear as other entries apear as well.
- The "ecovillage" term actualy is not unknown in wikipedia. It exists on 14 languages !
- AIH is one of those "eco-villages", which are already exist under "Global Ecovillage Network". like Findhorn Foundation, Auroville, Crystal Waters, one in Argentina and one in Mexico, the other Danish one Svanholm etc.
I am wondering why some can exists others not. In the same time you have all different companies (car companies etc) and places all kind. Eco-villages, eco-societies are as important as others. Showing the way how people can live sustainable in this world.
(I tried to write this to Collectonian.)
Judit Szoleczky
--Judit Szoleczky (talk) 14:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think you could probably succeed in these articles if you did not copy from previously published material, and if you can find 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases), that talk about it in a substantial way. DGG (talk) 17:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi DGG (David). Thanks taking care a little. Well I got somewhat disapointed from wikipedia's administration process. While on the Danish site people are happy if you work and enter material, here in the English page people are using their time to delete things instead of being happy.
The other problem is that I do not understand that why original reference is not good. I thought that original reference is the best, because you can see that it is true. May be I have an engineering aproach to it.
Apropo, can you send me the text I made on Andelssamfundet i Hjortshøj judit.szoleczky@gmail.com. I read that text, which was deleted once will be deleted again (great big wiki-brother looks at you). Just I would read what was so wrong with it. Though, I think still should be a way that sustainable-communities also get into the English wikipedia as well. Though as I can see that the proposed eco-society is not famous enough for the "US" wikipedia for the time being and I do not have so much time.
I do not totally understand the system, if you would read this or not. But if you do not answer, I will put it up to the discussion or talk of your site. best wishes.--Judit Szoleczky (talk) 21:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Please rewrite INFORSE-Europe
[edit]Dear Judit,
Could you please conform to Wikipedia standards - it's an encyclopedia, not a public relations text dump, you know - and write a normal article, not just bullet points with spammy self-references to the website. Aren't there any independent sources? It's just an hour's work. Thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 23:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Dear Hansmuller, Sorry reading late. I got again mood to contribute to wiki. You have a point. I will try. thanks for the concrete proposal what to do. bests. Judit JSZ (talk) 10:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Judit,
After all these years this article is still a shoddy public-relations operation and so an abuse of Wikipedia. People have complained about these Inforse articles (multi-Wikipedia) to me. Can't you write the activities of INFORSE up in honest prose instead of a dense incredibly selfpromoting list? Not that hard. Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 17:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Judit Szoleczky. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2019 (UTC)