User talk:JudaPoor
November 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Funnyfarmofdoom. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to University of Chester—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 19:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
[edit] Hi JudaPoor! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Tesla, Inc. that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
Redraiderengineer (talk) 02:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I think I pressed it. Y mistake
- Are you stalking me or something Btw? JudaPoor (talk) 03:29, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page SciShow, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]
Your recent editing history at SpaceX Starship shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Redraiderengineer (talk) 21:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- This is simply false. As agreed by a moderator the consensus is that it is a success. Another individual attempted to change this despite it being contradictory to said current consensus as well as past precedent.
- This was not an edit war. JudaPoor (talk) 21:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Redraiderengineer (talk) 13:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)