User talk:Juan Tu

TREND iS dEAD! records

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of TREND iS dEAD! records, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Trend_is_dead!_records. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TREND iS dEAD! records

A tag has been placed on TREND iS dEAD! records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tyrol5 [Talk] 23:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not copy articles into new articles.

Since Trend is dead! records already exists, there was no need to create the article with the funny capitalization. If you think an alternative capitalization is likely to be searched, you can redirect that name to the existing article; I have done this for you in this case. LadyofShalott 23:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Juan Tu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! LadyofShalott 23:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Please do not create pages that duplicate existing topics. Instead, add information and sources to existing articles. Thank you. Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:11, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Frantics (band) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/thefranticsinsc.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page TREND iS dEAD! records do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/trendisdeadrecords.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by 24 hours. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. LadyofShalott 00:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trend is dead capitalization

Juan Tu, it looks like your intent is to rename the article to have the proper capitalization. I've entered a move request to do so. Depending on the discussion, in seven days, it will be done. Bsherr (talk) 00:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Juan Tu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The correct capitalization, as it SHOULD appear on the page, is "tREND iS dEAD! records", not "Trend is dead! Records", "TREND iS dEAD! records", "Trend is dead records" or any other deviation; it is "tREND iS dEAD! records" per every release that label ever put out and its homesite. The "official links" I tried to submit for that label (tREND iS dEAD! records) and one of its bands (The Frantics) are in fact MySpace pages. However, these are the only "officially" sanctioned web pages by either, as the links to the AOL sites on both pages have been expired for almost two years now. The guys from The Frantics run their MySpace page themselves, and the tREND iS dEAD! records MySpace page states it is the "official" tREND iS dEAD! records site. I tried to make these corrections (albeit, I went about correcting the punctuation for "tREND iS dEAD! records" all wrong - - sorry 'bout that) as well as add a little more info (since the articles were listed as stubs), but each time I did someone came along and changed everything back. I don't really care if I am unblocked, so please have someone else that isn't blocked fix it to "tREND iS dEAD! records", and change both The Frantics and tREND iS dEAD! records "official sites" back to their MySpace pages. Thanks (geez)

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 06:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article OPIUM has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]