User talk:Jtrannel

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Jtrannel, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Rgds, - Trident13 (talk) 19:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Van Kampen

Regarding your edits to the Robrt Van Kampen biography, you have incorrect information. We have revised it once again to correct. You were using a combination of information from Jr. and Sr. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtrannel (talk • contribs) 17:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks for your message! Always gald to get good input on an article, particularly for someone who had led such an interesting life. Having seen the problems of intertwining of the history of father/son which you pointed out, I have adjusted the flow back to a more standard wiki format. I have also added the significant New York Times obituary. I hope this meets with your agreement, although if you have any further questions please advise - happy to assist. With Best Regards, - Trident13 (talk) 19:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You still have the information wrong. We work directly for the family and updated the information per their request. The funds as you have amended again are not in Sola Scriptura. If you are not agreeable with the changes we have made, I suggest you remove the page altogether. We do not wish to have the fact that he is married to Judy and have three children included, for security purposes. Please revert the page back to what we had updated it to, or remove it. Thank you.

Sorry, I just read your previous reply. We do wish to have it as we amended. He was, indeed, a very interesting man and lived an amazing life. :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtrannel (talk • contribs) 22:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good - glad that is all sorted out then. If it means the article is more acceptable to the family, and we retain an article on a significant person, I have made adjustments re his family members details which desensitises the information without degradating the content significantly. If you notice any more issues, then let me know and happy to assist. Best Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]