User talk:Jsprocks101

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, Jsprocks101, and thank you for joining Wikipedia. We appreciate your help and contributions. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

For general help, there is live chat help or the new users' help page
For help with editing, please see our editing tutorial or our cheatsheet
To create a new article, please use the article wizard
To add an image to an article, please see our cheatsheet and our uploading images guide
For a general overview of contributing to Wikipedia, please visit our introduction page

Here's a helpful tip. When writing messages to others, please end your message with four tildes (~~~~). This automatically adds your username and date and is called signing your message. Thanks again for helping Wikipedia. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 17:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hi Jsprocks101, I noticed your profile and I think you are the best. FinalRapture - † ☪ 18:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC) ==Your article submission[reply]

warnings on vandalism

I saw your warnings to potatoface. Thanks. A few concerns. 1. Most importantly, be sure to put them on the user talk page, not the user page. 2. Please sign the messages. 3. Use the "last warning" as the last warning. If the user posts more vandalism, after the last warning, report the user and s/he will be blocked. Happy editing. – S. Rich (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

First warning for vandalism: Jsprocks101, I reverted your vandalism to the Jacob Perkins article, and noticed you'd vandalized Franz Martin Hilgendorf, Blaise Pascal, and Napoleon as well. Eric ^talk 16:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jsprocks101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I realise some vandalisation has been made using my account. My account was gotten into and used as a vandalisation tool. I have managed to revert all the vandalisation from this account. However, it is clear my account was not only used for vandalism. I have legitimately edited numerous articles very well and started some and I am utterley disgusted with the way this case is being handled. Leaving a first warning, but then returning to write that I am blocked? Completely immoral. My act has been cleared up. But it was not me. As you know, before the date and before around that time period I was editing only legitimately. The editing that was vandalization was also from a different IP. So think, and then please unblock me. Jsprocks101 (talk)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, if your account has been compromised, WP:GOTHACKED applies. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:19, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jsprocks101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. Recently, many articles were vandalised from my account. This due to some blatant idiots who used my account while i was logged in. I have dealed with their idiocracy and have reverted edits from my account. I now apologise on their behalf and will not do this again. I can promise to edit articles only well and be a idol in the combat of vandalism! Jsprocks101 (talk) 3:12 pm, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

See above. Once you have made the claim that your account is compromised, it will never be unblocked. We have no way of knowing whether you have actually regained control of your account or not, or whether you are in fact the original user of the account. Since no unblock appeal will ever be accepted for this account, I have blocked talkpage access as well. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.