User talk:Jsg1993

Rubiks cube movie

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Rubiks cube movie. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) 23:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

J G

A tag has been placed on J G, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to provide more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:J G. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such material.

If you're trying to post a link to your personal website, that is unacceptable in an article, but you may post it on your User Page, which is User:Jsg1993. Fan-1967 23:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jg.teach-nology.com

No. You can't post it there, either. Fan-1967 23:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently re-created the article Jg.teach-nology.com, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Fan-1967 23:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the link to your website from your User page. It's still spam. Stop. Now. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"made by user:jsg1993"

Signatures are only for Talk pages and discussions. We don't sign articles. All articles are considered to be community projects, per Wikipedia:Ownership of articles.

Also, your edits to ME are inappropriate. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and the simple reference to Wiktionary, our dictionary counterpart, is what belongs here. Fan-1967 04:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Squirrels-austin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 23:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as The Squirrels-austin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 23:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 15 minutes because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated. --Gray Porpoise_{Your wish is my command!} 23:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your repeated spamming of your website has come to an end. You have been indefinitely blocked. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{i stoped i'v created two fair sites Pyrotechnical mine and user:jsg1993}}

And you added your spam link to your User page, and when I removed the linking, you added it back. That was the final straw, and why you were indefinitely blocked. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Toman.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Toman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyromine.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pyromine.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Jg_me.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jg_me.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jsg1993 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Back in 2006 I discovered Wikipedia and I decided to be an immature little kid and I made edits that defaced pages, that resulted in my account being banned. I have realized years later that I was horribly immature when I was a kid. I would like to use this username on Wikipedia to help add to this awesome community. I have grown up and am no longer a little immature kid and actually understand how to use this website, and would like to be a productive member of this community. Thanks,

jsg1993 (talk) 04:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

After a seven year block another chance is reasonable.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your block is now about seven years old, and I understand what you are saying. I am minded to unblock you; do you understand that any significant blockable transgression will be treated quite firmly? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do completely understand that any blockable transgression will be teated quite firmly.

jsg1993 (talk) 19:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]